Title | Citation | Year | Summary | Most Relevant | Type | Status |
Tiernan v. Martin |
2 Rob. (LA) 523, Supreme Court of Louisiana (July 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the Commercial Court of New Orleans, Watts, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Tippett v. Jett |
3 Rob. (LA) 313, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the District Court of Rapides, Lewis, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Tollett v. Jones |
3 Rob. (LA) 274, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the District Court of Claiborne, Campbell, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Towles v. Conrad |
3 Rob. (LA) 69, Supreme Court of Louisiana (September 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the Probate Court of St. Mary, Dumartrait, J. |
|
Cases |
|
U S v. Holmes |
1 Wall.Jr.C.C. 1, Circuit Court, ED Pennsylvania (April 22, 1842) |
1842 |
The American ship William Brown, left Liverpool on the 13th of March, 1841, bound for Philadelphia, in the United States. She had on board (besides a heavy cargo) 17 of a crew, and 65 passengers, Scotch and Irish emigrants. About 10 o'clock on the night of the 19th of April, when distant 250 miles southeast of Cape Race, Newfoundland, the vessel... |
|
Cases |
|
Valk v. Bank of State of South Carolina |
McMul.Eq. 414, Court of Appeals of Equity of South Carolina (February 01, 1842) |
1842 |
The holder of a negotiable note is not bound to give notice of the non-payment of the note by the drawer, to the first endorser, and a neglect to give notice to the first endorser does not discharge a subsequent endorser who had regular notice: S. P. Baily on Bills 225, see also Biles on Bills 164, and the authorities there collected on this... |
|
Cases |
|
Wade v. Green |
22 Tenn. 547, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1842) |
1842 |
On the 24th day of January, 1832, Thomas Green became the security of Farleigh B. Wade, the husband of Patsy Wade, in a note drawn in favor of Peter S. Decherd for $400, to fall due the 25th of December thereafter. To indemnify Green and secure him against loss on account of said suretyship, Farleigh B. Wade executed a deed of trust, of the same... |
|
Cases |
|
Wadsworth v. Goss |
2 Ired.Eq. 221, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1842) |
1842 |
The plaintiff's bill in this case dismissed with costs, the allegations therein not being sustained by the proofs. This bill was filed at Spring Term, 1836, of Davidson Court of Equity. The defendant's answer having come in, the injunction obtained on the filing of the bill was dissolved, and the bill lay over as an original bill. Replication was... |
|
Cases |
|
Wheelock v. Cozzens |
6 Howard 279, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1842) |
1842 |
The common law action of replevin will not lie, unless there has been a tortious taking. |
|
Cases |
|
Wherry v. Bell |
2 Rob. (LA) 225, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the District Court of West Feliciana, Dawson, J., presiding. |
|
Cases |
|
Wier v. Davis |
4 Ala. 442, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1842) |
1842 |
WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Pickens county. |
|
Cases |
|
Williams v. Brummel |
4 Ark. 129, Supreme Court of Arkansas (January 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Reading a notice to take depositions, is not a sufficient service, under a statute requiring notice in writing to be served on the party. A copy must be delivered. Parol evidence cannot be admitted to establish the contents of notes, which are not produced, or their absence accounted for; especially when the notes have been prosecuted to judgment... |
|
Cases |
|
Williams v. Haney |
3 Ala. 371, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Morgan. |
|
Cases |
|
Willis v. Butler |
2 Ired.Eq. 146, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1842) |
1842 |
The plaintiffs were two of a firm of nine partners, associated to work the Brindletown Gold Mine, in the county of Burke. By the articles of copartnership, the plaintiffs were to have 1/4 of the profits of the said mining operation. The company, in the years 1829 and 1830, employed Butler to superintend and oversee the business, and to receive all... |
|
Cases |
|
Wilson v. Hoss |
22 Tenn. 142, Supreme Court of Tennessee (July 01, 1842) |
1842 |
The records in this case show the following state of facts: At April term, 1842, administrator on the estate of William L. Wilson was granted to Landon C. Hoss, by the county court of Washington county. At the May term thereafter, David J. Wilson, the plaintiff in error, presented his petition to said court, stating that he was the next of kin to... |
|
Cases |
|
Winnard v. Robbins |
22 Tenn. 614, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1842) |
1842 |
This is an action of ejectment brought to recover two lots, Nos. 9 and 10, in McMinnville. It is obvious from an examination of the record that neither the plaintiff nor defendant has any legal title to the premises, properly derived, and upon which a recovery could be effected. In this state of a case, in general, the position of the defendant is... |
|
Cases |
|
Wiswall v. Glidden |
4 Ala. 357, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1842) |
1842 |
WRIT of Error to the County Court of Mobile. |
|
Cases |
|
Womack v. Nicholson |
3 Rob. (LA) 248, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Appeal from the District Court of Caddo, Campbell, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Wood v. Wood |
3 Ala. 756, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1842) |
1842 |
Writ of error to the Court of Chancery sitting at Columbiana. |
|
Cases |
|
Adams v. McCauley |
4 Rob. (LA) 184, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of West Feliciana, Johnson, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Adams v. Stuart |
4 Rob. (LA) 180, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of East Baton Rouge, Johnson, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Adams v. Tanner |
5 Ala. 740, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1843) |
1843 |
WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Sumter. |
|
Cases |
|
Allen v. Allen |
6 Rob. (LA) 104, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ouachita, Lamy, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Anderson v. Patrick |
7 Howard 347, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
A plea alleging that the plaintiff has an interest in the note sued on is bad, as amounting to the general issue. A replication to a plea, alleging that the plaintiff had no interest in the note sued on, which avers generally that the plaintiff had an interest in the note at the commencement of the suit, is a good answer to the plea, and must be... |
|
Cases |
|
Arrieux v. Dugas |
5 Rob. (LA) 453, Supreme Court of Louisiana (July 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ascension, Duffel, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Auguste v. Renard |
3 Rob. (LA) 389, Supreme Court of Louisiana (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Babin v. Nolan |
4 Rob. (LA) 278, Supreme Court of Louisiana (April 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the Court of Probates of West Baton Rouge, Favrot, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Baines v. McGee |
1 Smedes & M. 208, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (July 01, 1843) |
1843 |
The purchase of property, by an administrator, at his own sale, is viodable; but whether absolutely void or not, query? The case of J. & J. Cable, v. Martin & Bell, 1 How. 558, cited and confirmed. A sale by an administrator, unless for the purpose of paying debts, or to enable him to make distribution, is absolutely void. A private sale by an... |
|
Cases |
|
Bank of Alexandria v. Patton |
40 Va. 499, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (February 01, 1843) |
1843 |
A bill in equity by a corporation being dismissed at the hearing, and an appeal taken from the decree, pending the appeal the charter of the corporation expires. A motion is made to the appellate court, upon the authority of Rider v. The Union Factory, 7 Leigh 154. that the appeal be entered as abated for that cause. In opposition to the motion it... |
|
Cases |
|
Bank of Louisiana v. Ballard |
7 Howard 371, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Where money has, by mistake, in matter of fact, been paid to a wrong person, it may be recovered back in an action for money had and received. In action of assumpsit for money had and received, it cannot be objected, after judgment, that no account was filed with the declaration. |
|
Cases |
|
Bank of U.S. v. Beverly |
42 U.S. 134, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
THIS case grew out of that of Peter v. Beverly, which came before this court in 1836, on an appeal from the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, in decreeing an injunction on the proceedings of the then complainants, to sell a part of the real estate of David Peter, deceased. A full report of that case will be found in 10 Peters, 532, et... |
|
Cases |
|
Beall v. Cunningham |
3 B.Mon. 390, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (May 04, 1843) |
1843 |
The facts appearing in the case. AFTER the decision of this Court, reversing the order of the County Court of Washington, admitting to record, as the last will and testament of Richard Beall, deceased, a paper bearing date in 1825, and wholly written by himself, (1 Ben. Monroe, 399,) Cunningham and wife and others, claiming as devisees, exhibited... |
|
Cases |
|
Beam v. Blanton |
3 Ired.Eq. 59, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1843) |
1843 |
According to the rules of a Court of Equity, an injunction to restrain proceeding with an execution is a mandate to the creditor, not to the officer, and the person to be restrained thereby should be made a party to the proceedings. A vendor of a chattel has no lien upon the chattel for the unpaid purchase money. Nor has the surety of the vendee of... |
|
Cases |
|
Bennett v. Sherrod |
3 Ired. 303, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1843) |
1843 |
When a will is found among a deceased person's papers, immediately after his death, in a mutilated condition, the presuption of law is, that the act of mutilation was done by him in his lifetime, and for the purpose of revocation. The same presumption arises, where the repesitory of the will was equally accessible to a stranger and to the deceased... |
|
Cases |
|
Benton v. Williams |
Dallam 496, Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Eli Williams sued Jesse Benton in the district court of Harris county, to recover damages for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed by Benton on Williams. The defendant filed two pleas by way of answer to the plaintiff's petition. First, justification; and secondly, that the defendant ought not to be held to answer the complaint of... |
|
Cases |
|
Bergeron v. His Creditors |
4 Rob. (LA) 185, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of St. James, Deblieux, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Bertholi v. Deverges |
4 Rob. (LA) 431, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Bethea v. McColl |
5 Ala. 308, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
ERROR to the Chancery Court at Cahawba. |
|
Cases |
|
Bissell v. Leftwich |
4 Rob. (LA) 102, Supreme Court of Louisiana (February 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the Court of Probates of Iberville, Dutton, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Bixler's Trustee v. Taylor |
3 B.Mon. 362, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (May 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Trustees and trusts. Frauds--statute of. ERROR TO THE ANDERSON CIRCUIT. See the case of Penny vs Davis, Trustee, 42 Ky. 313, as showing the character of the title of the property in contest. ACCORDING to the principle settled in the case of Penny vs Davis, Trustee of Pierce, decided at the present term, the deed of trust set up in the original bill... |
|
Cases |
|
Black v. Planters' Bank |
23 Tenn. 367, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1843) |
1843 |
There is no question but that in England a fieri facias issued after the death of a party, but tested before his death, would bind his goods. Waghorne v. Langmead, 1 Bos. & Pul., 571. In this State the same doctrine has been held. In Preston v. Surgoine, Peck., 80, a majority of the court, against the opinion of Judge White, decided that a fieri... |
|
Cases |
|
Blount v. Traylor |
4 Ala. 667, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Chambers. |
|
Cases |
|
Boner v. Elgee |
6 Rob. (LA) 6, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of Caddo, Boyce, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Bonnefoy v. Landry |
4 Rob. (LA) 23, Supreme Court of Louisiana (February 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ascension, Duffel, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Bostick v. Lawton |
28 S.C.L. 258, Court of Appeals of Law of South Carolina (May 01, 1843) |
1843 |
1. Testator devised as follows:-I give, devise and bequeath unto my daughter, C. E. M., and to her heirs and assigns forever, all that tract of land purchased of R. T., and also that part of tract marked D, in the first purchase from Mr. J., not given to my son-in-law, S. M. W., as will more fully appear by reference to a deed given to A. and S.... |
|
Cases |
|
Bowling v. Lamar |
1 Gill 358, Court of Appeals of Maryland (December 01, 1843) |
1843 |
All objections to vouchers Nos. 1, 8, 9, 13, 18, and 32, for which credits were allowed Marein T. Lamar, administrator cum testamento annexo of James Lamar, in his account settled with the orphans court of Prince George's county, on the twenty-fifth of April, in the year 1843, being waived and withdrawn, this court are only called upon therefore to... |
|
Cases |
|
Branch Bank at Montgomery v. Parker |
5 Ala. 731, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1843) |
1843 |
WRIT of Error to the circuit court of Autauga. |
|
Cases |
|
Branch Bank v. Kinsey |
5 Ala. 9, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) |
1843 |
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Lawrence. |
|
Cases |
|
Brassac v. Ducros |
4 Rob. (LA) 335, Supreme Court of Louisiana (April 01, 1843) |
1843 |
Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. |
|
Cases |
|
Brooke v. Berry |
1 Gill 153, Court of Appeals of Maryland (December 01, 1843) |
1843 |
The inadmissibility of the evidence of the articles of agreement set out in the first bill of exceptions, was put in the court below, upon the ground that there existed no privity between Brooke and Elisha Berry, or that he claimed title under Elisha Berry; this could certainly furnish no justifiable ground for the rejection of the evidence. If the... |
|
Cases |
|