TitleCitationYearSummaryMost RelevantTypeStatus
Tiernan v. Martin 2 Rob. (LA) 523, Supreme Court of Louisiana (July 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the Commercial Court of New Orleans, Watts, J.   Cases  
Tippett v. Jett 3 Rob. (LA) 313, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the District Court of Rapides, Lewis, J.   Cases  
Tollett v. Jones 3 Rob. (LA) 274, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the District Court of Claiborne, Campbell, J.   Cases  
Towles v. Conrad 3 Rob. (LA) 69, Supreme Court of Louisiana (September 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the Probate Court of St. Mary, Dumartrait, J.   Cases  
U S v. Holmes 1 Wall.Jr.C.C. 1, Circuit Court, ED Pennsylvania (April 22, 1842) 1842 The American ship William Brown, left Liverpool on the 13th of March, 1841, bound for Philadelphia, in the United States. She had on board (besides a heavy cargo) 17 of a crew, and 65 passengers, Scotch and Irish emigrants. About 10 o'clock on the night of the 19th of April, when distant 250 miles southeast of Cape Race, Newfoundland, the vessel...   Cases  
Valk v. Bank of State of South Carolina McMul.Eq. 414, Court of Appeals of Equity of South Carolina (February 01, 1842) 1842 The holder of a negotiable note is not bound to give notice of the non-payment of the note by the drawer, to the first endorser, and a neglect to give notice to the first endorser does not discharge a subsequent endorser who had regular notice: S. P. Baily on Bills 225, see also Biles on Bills 164, and the authorities there collected on this...   Cases  
Wade v. Green 22 Tenn. 547, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1842) 1842 On the 24th day of January, 1832, Thomas Green became the security of Farleigh B. Wade, the husband of Patsy Wade, in a note drawn in favor of Peter S. Decherd for $400, to fall due the 25th of December thereafter. To indemnify Green and secure him against loss on account of said suretyship, Farleigh B. Wade executed a deed of trust, of the same...   Cases  
Wadsworth v. Goss 2 Ired.Eq. 221, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1842) 1842 The plaintiff's bill in this case dismissed with costs, the allegations therein not being sustained by the proofs. This bill was filed at Spring Term, 1836, of Davidson Court of Equity. The defendant's answer having come in, the injunction obtained on the filing of the bill was dissolved, and the bill lay over as an original bill. Replication was...   Cases  
Wheelock v. Cozzens 6 Howard 279, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1842) 1842 The common law action of replevin will not lie, unless there has been a tortious taking.   Cases  
Wherry v. Bell 2 Rob. (LA) 225, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the District Court of West Feliciana, Dawson, J., presiding.   Cases  
Wier v. Davis 4 Ala. 442, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1842) 1842 WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Pickens county.   Cases  
Williams v. Brummel 4 Ark. 129, Supreme Court of Arkansas (January 01, 1842) 1842 Reading a notice to take depositions, is not a sufficient service, under a statute requiring notice in writing to be served on the party. A copy must be delivered. Parol evidence cannot be admitted to establish the contents of notes, which are not produced, or their absence accounted for; especially when the notes have been prosecuted to judgment...   Cases  
Williams v. Haney 3 Ala. 371, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1842) 1842 Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Morgan.   Cases  
Willis v. Butler 2 Ired.Eq. 146, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1842) 1842 The plaintiffs were two of a firm of nine partners, associated to work the Brindletown Gold Mine, in the county of Burke. By the articles of copartnership, the plaintiffs were to have 1/4 of the profits of the said mining operation. The company, in the years 1829 and 1830, employed Butler to superintend and oversee the business, and to receive all...   Cases  
Wilson v. Hoss 22 Tenn. 142, Supreme Court of Tennessee (July 01, 1842) 1842 The records in this case show the following state of facts: At April term, 1842, administrator on the estate of William L. Wilson was granted to Landon C. Hoss, by the county court of Washington county. At the May term thereafter, David J. Wilson, the plaintiff in error, presented his petition to said court, stating that he was the next of kin to...   Cases  
Winnard v. Robbins 22 Tenn. 614, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1842) 1842 This is an action of ejectment brought to recover two lots, Nos. 9 and 10, in McMinnville. It is obvious from an examination of the record that neither the plaintiff nor defendant has any legal title to the premises, properly derived, and upon which a recovery could be effected. In this state of a case, in general, the position of the defendant is...   Cases  
Wiswall v. Glidden 4 Ala. 357, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1842) 1842 WRIT of Error to the County Court of Mobile.   Cases  
Womack v. Nicholson 3 Rob. (LA) 248, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1842) 1842 Appeal from the District Court of Caddo, Campbell, J.   Cases  
Wood v. Wood 3 Ala. 756, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1842) 1842 Writ of error to the Court of Chancery sitting at Columbiana.   Cases  
Adams v. McCauley 4 Rob. (LA) 184, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of West Feliciana, Johnson, J.   Cases  
Adams v. Stuart 4 Rob. (LA) 180, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of East Baton Rouge, Johnson, J.   Cases  
Adams v. Tanner 5 Ala. 740, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1843) 1843 WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Sumter.   Cases  
Allen v. Allen 6 Rob. (LA) 104, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ouachita, Lamy, J.   Cases  
Anderson v. Patrick 7 Howard 347, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1843) 1843 A plea alleging that the plaintiff has an interest in the note sued on is bad, as amounting to the general issue. A replication to a plea, alleging that the plaintiff had no interest in the note sued on, which avers generally that the plaintiff had an interest in the note at the commencement of the suit, is a good answer to the plea, and must be...   Cases  
Arrieux v. Dugas 5 Rob. (LA) 453, Supreme Court of Louisiana (July 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ascension, Duffel, J.   Cases  
Auguste v. Renard 3 Rob. (LA) 389, Supreme Court of Louisiana (January 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.   Cases  
Babin v. Nolan 4 Rob. (LA) 278, Supreme Court of Louisiana (April 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the Court of Probates of West Baton Rouge, Favrot, J.   Cases  
Baines v. McGee 1 Smedes & M. 208, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (July 01, 1843) 1843 The purchase of property, by an administrator, at his own sale, is viodable; but whether absolutely void or not, query? The case of J. & J. Cable, v. Martin & Bell, 1 How. 558, cited and confirmed. A sale by an administrator, unless for the purpose of paying debts, or to enable him to make distribution, is absolutely void. A private sale by an...   Cases  
Bank of Alexandria v. Patton 40 Va. 499, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (February 01, 1843) 1843 A bill in equity by a corporation being dismissed at the hearing, and an appeal taken from the decree, pending the appeal the charter of the corporation expires. A motion is made to the appellate court, upon the authority of Rider v. The Union Factory, 7 Leigh 154. that the appeal be entered as abated for that cause. In opposition to the motion it...   Cases  
Bank of Louisiana v. Ballard 7 Howard 371, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (January 01, 1843) 1843 Where money has, by mistake, in matter of fact, been paid to a wrong person, it may be recovered back in an action for money had and received. In action of assumpsit for money had and received, it cannot be objected, after judgment, that no account was filed with the declaration.   Cases  
Bank of U.S. v. Beverly 42 U.S. 134, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1843) 1843 THIS case grew out of that of Peter v. Beverly, which came before this court in 1836, on an appeal from the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, in decreeing an injunction on the proceedings of the then complainants, to sell a part of the real estate of David Peter, deceased. A full report of that case will be found in 10 Peters, 532, et...   Cases  
Beall v. Cunningham 3 B.Mon. 390, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (May 04, 1843) 1843 The facts appearing in the case. AFTER the decision of this Court, reversing the order of the County Court of Washington, admitting to record, as the last will and testament of Richard Beall, deceased, a paper bearing date in 1825, and wholly written by himself, (1 Ben. Monroe, 399,) Cunningham and wife and others, claiming as devisees, exhibited...   Cases  
Beam v. Blanton 3 Ired.Eq. 59, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1843) 1843 According to the rules of a Court of Equity, an injunction to restrain proceeding with an execution is a mandate to the creditor, not to the officer, and the person to be restrained thereby should be made a party to the proceedings. A vendor of a chattel has no lien upon the chattel for the unpaid purchase money. Nor has the surety of the vendee of...   Cases  
Bennett v. Sherrod 3 Ired. 303, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1843) 1843 When a will is found among a deceased person's papers, immediately after his death, in a mutilated condition, the presuption of law is, that the act of mutilation was done by him in his lifetime, and for the purpose of revocation. The same presumption arises, where the repesitory of the will was equally accessible to a stranger and to the deceased...   Cases  
Benton v. Williams Dallam 496, Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas (January 01, 1843) 1843 Eli Williams sued Jesse Benton in the district court of Harris county, to recover damages for an assault and battery alleged to have been committed by Benton on Williams. The defendant filed two pleas by way of answer to the plaintiff's petition. First, justification; and secondly, that the defendant ought not to be held to answer the complaint of...   Cases  
Bergeron v. His Creditors 4 Rob. (LA) 185, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of St. James, Deblieux, J.   Cases  
Bertholi v. Deverges 4 Rob. (LA) 431, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.   Cases  
Bethea v. McColl 5 Ala. 308, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) 1843 ERROR to the Chancery Court at Cahawba.   Cases  
Bissell v. Leftwich 4 Rob. (LA) 102, Supreme Court of Louisiana (February 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the Court of Probates of Iberville, Dutton, J.   Cases  
Bixler's Trustee v. Taylor 3 B.Mon. 362, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (May 01, 1843) 1843 Trustees and trusts. Frauds--statute of. ERROR TO THE ANDERSON CIRCUIT. See the case of Penny vs Davis, Trustee, 42 Ky. 313, as showing the character of the title of the property in contest. ACCORDING to the principle settled in the case of Penny vs Davis, Trustee of Pierce, decided at the present term, the deed of trust set up in the original bill...   Cases  
Black v. Planters' Bank 23 Tenn. 367, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1843) 1843 There is no question but that in England a fieri facias issued after the death of a party, but tested before his death, would bind his goods. Waghorne v. Langmead, 1 Bos. & Pul., 571. In this State the same doctrine has been held. In Preston v. Surgoine, Peck., 80, a majority of the court, against the opinion of Judge White, decided that a fieri...   Cases  
Blount v. Traylor 4 Ala. 667, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) 1843 WRIT of Error to the Circuit Court of Chambers.   Cases  
Boner v. Elgee 6 Rob. (LA) 6, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of Caddo, Boyce, J.   Cases  
Bonnefoy v. Landry 4 Rob. (LA) 23, Supreme Court of Louisiana (February 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the Court of Probates of Ascension, Duffel, J.   Cases  
Bostick v. Lawton 28 S.C.L. 258, Court of Appeals of Law of South Carolina (May 01, 1843) 1843 1. Testator devised as follows:-I give, devise and bequeath unto my daughter, C. E. M., and to her heirs and assigns forever, all that tract of land purchased of R. T., and also that part of tract marked D, in the first purchase from Mr. J., not given to my son-in-law, S. M. W., as will more fully appear by reference to a deed given to A. and S....   Cases  
Bowling v. Lamar 1 Gill 358, Court of Appeals of Maryland (December 01, 1843) 1843 All objections to vouchers Nos. 1, 8, 9, 13, 18, and 32, for which credits were allowed Marein T. Lamar, administrator cum testamento annexo of James Lamar, in his account settled with the orphans court of Prince George's county, on the twenty-fifth of April, in the year 1843, being waived and withdrawn, this court are only called upon therefore to...   Cases  
Branch Bank at Montgomery v. Parker 5 Ala. 731, Supreme Court of Alabama (June 01, 1843) 1843 WRIT of Error to the circuit court of Autauga.   Cases  
Branch Bank v. Kinsey 5 Ala. 9, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1843) 1843 ERROR to the Circuit Court of Lawrence.   Cases  
Brassac v. Ducros 4 Rob. (LA) 335, Supreme Court of Louisiana (April 01, 1843) 1843 Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J.   Cases  
Brooke v. Berry 1 Gill 153, Court of Appeals of Maryland (December 01, 1843) 1843 The inadmissibility of the evidence of the articles of agreement set out in the first bill of exceptions, was put in the court below, upon the ground that there existed no privity between Brooke and Elisha Berry, or that he claimed title under Elisha Berry; this could certainly furnish no justifiable ground for the rejection of the evidence. If the...   Cases  
201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218