Title | Citation | Year | Summary | Most Relevant | Type | Status |
Gibson's Heirs v. Jones |
5 Leigh 370, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (April 01, 1834) |
1834 |
(Absent Brooke, J.) Real estate is conveyed to trustees to secure payment of a debt; after the death of the debtor, the trustees proceed to sell the trust subject, to pay the amount claimed by the creditor; it appears, that the just amount of debt depends on accounts not yet settled, and so the amount due is unascertained, and there is reason to... |
|
Cases |
|
Goddard's Heirs v. Urquhart |
6 La. 659, Supreme Court of Louisiana (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Goodhand v. Benton |
6 G. & J. 481, Court of Appeals of Maryland (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The question which arises on the second bill of exceptions is one which has been so long settled by the universal practice of courts of justice; is so deeply rooted in the plainest principles of reason, justice, and common sense, that it was a matter of some surprise to find it made the subject of grave discussion in this State, in the appellate... |
|
Cases |
|
Gottschalk v. De La Rosa |
6 La. 219, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Graham v. Durant |
2 Hill (SC) 517, Court of Appeals of Law and Equity of South Carolina (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The fact of negligence is, I think, very satisfactorily made out; and the counsel for the motion has rested it mainly on the ground that the damages are for the whole amount of the execution against Gayle. In the case of Futch v Walker, 1 Bail. 98, which was an action against the sheriff for negligence, Mr. Justice Nott, who delivered the opinion... |
|
Cases |
|
Grant v. Walden |
6 La. 623, Supreme Court of Louisiana (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Green v. Cook |
2 Dev.Eq. 531, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
Several exceptions have been taken by the plaintiff to the report of the commissioner, but the court understands from the counsel on both sides, that it is not required to pass upon any but a part of the seventh exception, because if that be not sustained, the plaintiff cannot bring the defendant in debt; and if it be sustained, the parties will... |
|
Cases |
|
Green v. Rumph |
2 Hill Eq. 1, Court of Appeals of Law and Equity of South Carolina (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
It will not be questioned that the legal estate in the property of the wife vested in the husband on the marriage. At the time of the execution of this deed, the property which it professes to convey to her was her own, consequently the defendant, Rumph, had no interest, and could convey none, so that, in a legal point of view, the deed was a mere... |
|
Cases |
|
Grounx v. Abat's Ex'rs |
7 La. 17, Supreme Court of Louisiana (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE PARISH COURT, FOR THE PARISH AND CITY OF NEW-ORLEANS. |
|
Cases |
|
Hall v. Hall |
6 G. & J. 386, Court of Appeals of Maryland (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
However it may be proper as a general rule, that the court shall adopt the language of a motion for instruction as preferred by counsel, yet if this court can perceive that full and substantial justice has been done to the party, by declaring the law accurately, and in terms explicit and intelligible to the jury, upon the points raised by counsel,... |
|
Cases |
|
Hall v. Mulhollan |
7 La. 383, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Hawkins v. Brown |
7 La. 417, Supreme Court of Louisiana (October 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Hazard's Adm'r v. New England Marine Ins. Co. |
33 U.S. 557, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the Massachusetts district. In the circuit court, an action of assumpsit was instituted by the plaintiff in error, as the administrator of Thomas Hazard, deceased, on a policy of insurance, dated 26th December 1827, whereby the defendants caused to be assured Josiah Bradlee & Co., for Thomas... |
|
Cases |
The case or administrative decision has some negative history, but has not been reversed or overruled. |
Heath v. Heath |
2 Hill Eq. 100, Court of Appeals of Law and Equity of South Carolina (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The questions to be decided, arise between the co-defendants, Mrs. Heath, and Hunt and wife. To a clear perception and a just decision of them, a summary of the facts may be useful. Mrs. Heath and Mrs. Hunt are the widow and one of the children of Frederick Heath, who, among other things, by his will, directed the annual profits of his estate to be... |
|
Cases |
|
Heirs of Kimball v. Heirs of Lopez |
7 La. 173, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE OF THE EIGHTH PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Henderson v. Bates |
3 Blackf. 460, Supreme Court of Indiana (November 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The principal question to be settled in this case is, Does the bill of Henderson show that he is without relief at law, and that a court of equity should interpose? The complainant contends that the case presented by the bill is peculiarly appropriate to a court of equity, and in support of his position assumes several grounds, each of which in the... |
|
Cases |
|
Henry v. Stewart |
2 Hill (SC) 328, Court of Appeals of Law and Equity of South Carolina (April 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The right of the plaintiff to recover depends, first, upon the construction of the will of Thomas Bell, and secondly, upon the statute of limitations. These points in the case will naturally be considered in the order in which I have stated them. 1. The different clauses of the will constitute a devise to Elizabeth Bell and the lawful issue of her... |
|
Cases |
|
Hewet & Co. v. Wilson |
7 La. 71, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Hiligsberg v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. |
6 La. 228, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Hunter v. Sevier |
15 Tenn. 127, Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals of Tennessee (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The plaintiff alleges the defendant did unlawfully detain his mare. The defendant pleads he did not unlawfully detain her. The defendant lived on a leading road in Overton county, and kept a public house, having a large farm. The mare was left with him by George W. Campbell, to be fed and kept for an indefinite, but short, time. Campbell was the... |
|
Cases |
|
Huset's Heirs v. Lefebvre |
6 La. 601, Supreme Court of Louisiana (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
In re Yates' Will |
2 Dana 215, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (May 07, 1834) |
1834 |
FROM THE FAYETTE COUNTY COURT. The validity of this will has been contested on two grounds. The grounds on which the validity of the will was contested. First. The want of capacity on the part of testatrix, and an undue influence and management used in procuring the will to be executed. Second. That, at the time of its execution and of her death,... |
|
Cases |
|
Jackson ex dem. Varick v. Waldron |
13 Wend. 178, Court for the Correction of Errors of New York (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
In the present case, as in the case of Varick & Bacon v. Jackson, which was formerly before this court, both parties claim under the will of Medcef Eden, the elder. But the questions now presented are entirely different from those which then arose; not only from the different state of facts then presented, but more especially from the... |
|
Cases |
The case or administrative decision has some negative history, but has not been reversed or overruled. |
Jackson v. Blount |
2 Dev.Eq. 555, Supreme Court of North Carolina (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
After stating the facts as above, proceeded:--Upon these facts it is manifest that the relation of mortgagor, and mortgagee did originally exist between the plaintiff and the intestate, the ancestor of the defendants. It is almost equally plain that whatever might be the form of the proceedings at the sheriff's sale, or the legal effect of the... |
|
Cases |
|
Jamieson v. Bruce |
6 G. & J. 72, Court of Appeals of Maryland (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The point in controversy in this cause involves the consideration of the relative rights of mortgagor and mortgagee, before forfeiture, and in a case where the mortgage contains no covenant, or agreement that the mortgagor shall retain possession of the property mortgaged. The mortgagor seeks to make the mortgagee, obtaining peaceable possession of... |
|
Cases |
|
Jones' Adm'r v. Comer's Ex'r |
5 Leigh 350, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (April 01, 1834) |
1834 |
(Absent Brooke, J.) Upon a bill by mortgagor against mortgagee to foreclose, satisfaction or release presumed from the lapse of 20 years, such presumption being corroborated, rather than rebutted, by other circumstances. Such presumption ought regularly to be relied on in the answer, not by way of plea; but if relied on by plea, this irregularity... |
|
Cases |
|
Jones v. Miles |
1 Howard 50, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (July 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The statute upon the subject of bonds for the forthcoming of property taken in execution, is to be strictly pursued. A forthcoming bond should show to whom the property belonged which has been levied upon, and if, from that showing, it should appear, that the property so levied upon was not liable to satisfy the execution upon which said bond was... |
|
Cases |
|
Jordan v. Trice |
14 Tenn. 479, Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals of Tennessee (May 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The question to be considered is whether this is a personal covenant made to the purchaser, Trice, by Bradford and Jordan. They do not set up this as a defence in their plea to the action, but rely upon having kept their covenant with the plaintiff. Still, if upon the face of the covenant set out in the declaration, they have not bound themselves... |
|
Cases |
|
Joyce v. Poydras de la Lande |
6 La. 277, Supreme Court of Louisiana (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FOURTH DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
JURISDICTION OF THE CHOCTAW COURTS. |
2 U.S. Op. Atty. Gen. 693 (December 26, 1834) |
1834 |
|
|
Administrative Decisions & Guidance |
|
Key v. Walker |
7 La. 297, Supreme Court of Louisiana (September 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Keys v. Powell |
7 La. 143, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Keziah v. Slye |
4 Cranch C.C. 463, Circuit Court, District of Columbia (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
The petitioner [a negress] belonged to the defendant's wife, and was brought from Virginia to Washington, under the 9th section of the Maryland act of 1796 (chapter 67), but was not recorded within three months thereafter, as required by the statute. |
|
Cases |
|
King v. Cohorn |
14 Tenn. 75, Supreme Court of Errors and Appeals of Tennessee (March 01, 1834) |
1834 |
This is a bill to set aside an agreement for the sale of a lot of land in Nashville, conveyed by complainant to defendant, on the ground that the defendant imposed upon the complainant and obtained the deed for her lot by fraud. In considering the testimony in this cause it is important to take into view the condition and character of the parties.... |
|
Cases |
|
Kirk v. Glover |
5 Stew. & P. 340, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
In error to the Circuit Court of Marengo. Jesse L. Kirk brought an action of trover against Allen Glover, for the recovery of the value of a sealed note; to which action the defendant plead the general issue; and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the defendant. To reverse this judgment, the defendant having filed exceptions, took a... |
|
Cases |
|
Lange v. Richoux |
6 La. 560, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Langford's Ex'r v. Perrin |
5 Leigh 552, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
(Absent Brooke, J.) A. B. and C. are sureties for D. in a bond; judgment is recovered against D. the principal, and the sureties A. and B. but not against the other surety C. and a fi. fa. being sued out on the judgment, and levied on the property of D. the principal, he gives a forthcoming bond, in which A. and B. and another person join him as... |
|
Cases |
|
Lanier v. Ross |
1 Dev. & Bat.Eq. 39, Supreme Court of North Carolina (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
As all the acquisitions of a feme covert made by her own act, during the coverture, enure to her husband, a bill seeking to enforce the execution of an agreement, for the purchase of property, and a conveyance of it to the sole and separate use of a married woman, her husband not joining in it, will be dismissed. THE case made by the bill was, that... |
|
Cases |
|
Lanoue v. Reed |
7 La. 112, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Lee v. Lee |
33 U.S. 44, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
IN error to the circuit court of the United States for the county of Washington. In the opinion of the court the facts are fully stated. Mr Coxe cited, Davis's Collection of the Laws of the District of Columbia 155, act of Congress of May 3, 1802; Davis's Collect. 123, act of Congress of 1801; Davis's Collect. 265, act of June 1812, sect. 12. These... |
|
Cases |
|
Lenox v. Notrebe |
Hempst. 251, Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas (July 01, 1834) |
1834 |
This was a suit by John H. Lenox, surviving administrator of William Lenox, deceased, against Frederick Notrebe and others on original bill; and Mary Ann Hamilton and Margaret Hamilton, by their guardian, against Frederick Notrebe and others, on cross-bill. A receiver was appointed in this case. Case. No. 8,246b. Bills in chancery. |
|
Cases |
|
Life & Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Wilson's Heirs |
33 U.S. 291, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
ON a motion for a mandamus to the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. This case, as stated in the opinion of the court, was as follows. This suit was commenced in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, on the 26th of May 1826. The action was brought on a mortgage on real... |
|
Cases |
|
Liles v. Rhodes |
7 La. 87, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Lindsay v. Etheridge |
1 Dev. & Bat.Eq. 36, Supreme Court of North Carolina (December 01, 1834) |
1834 |
Where upon the bill and answer it appears the defendant can claim under the wills of two testators, and no election, nor any fact which puts him to one is charged, none will be denied. THE plaintiffs in their bill alleged, that Sampson Etheridge, their father, by his will gave all his property to the defendant Elizabeth, his wife, for life, with... |
|
Cases |
|
Louis v. Carbarrus |
7 La. 170, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Lowery v. Kline |
6 La. 380, Supreme Court of Louisiana (April 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Marigny v. Perret |
6 La. 695, Supreme Court of Louisiana (June 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. |
|
Cases |
|
Mary v. Morris |
7 La. 135, Supreme Court of Louisiana (August 01, 1834) |
1834 |
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. |
|
Cases |
|
Matheney v. Guess |
2 Hill Eq. 63, Court of Appeals of Law and Equity of South Carolina (May 01, 1834) |
1834 |
It is not disputed that, according to the English authorities, the assignment by the husband would be good, in as much as he survived his wife. But it is supposed that this is only because the husband surviving the wife, in England, is entitled to her whole personal estate, and does not apply under our statute of distributions, where the children... |
|
Cases |
|
McCutchen v. Marshall |
33 U.S. 220, Supreme Court of the United States (January 01, 1834) |
1834 |
ON appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of West Tennessee. In the circuit court of West Tennessee, the appellants, James M'Cutchen and others, citizens of Missouri, Kentucky, Ohio and Mississippi, complainants, filed a bill against James Marshall and others, citizens of the state of Tennessee, defendants. The bill... |
|
Cases |
|