Author | Title | Citation | Summary | Year | Type | Key Terms in Title or Summary | Case Status |
|
61-1 Bca ¶ 3016, Watson Laundry and Cleaners |
Cont. Contract Appeals Decisions 3016 (Date Unkown) |
[61-1 BCA ¶ 3016] WATSON LAUNDRY AND CLEANERS ASBCA NO. 6267, AIR FORCE CONTRACT APPEALS PANEL, April 14, 1961, , 61-1 BCA ¶ 3016.TERMINATION THE CONTRACT WAS PROPERLY TERMINATED FOR DEFAULT WHERE THE EVIDENCE SHOWED THAT THE CONTRACTOR DID NOT MEET THE STANDARDS OF QUALITY REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT. OPINION BY COL. MATTOON WITH MR. CRAWFORD AND... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Bolling et Al. V. Sharpe et Al. |
Labor & Employment Law 96215 (Date Unkown) |
347 U.S. 497 BOLLING ET AL. v. SHARPE ET AL. BOLLING v. SHARPE, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 8. Argued December 1011, 1952. Reargued December 89, 1953. Decided Decided May 17, 1954. George E. C. Hayes and James M. Nabrit, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners on the... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Brown et Al. V. Board of Education of Topeka et Al. |
Labor & Employment Law 96216 (Date Unkown) |
347 U.S. 483 BROWN ET AL. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA ET AL. BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 1. Argued December 9, 1952. Reargued December 8, 1953. Decided May 17, 1954. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for appellants in No. 1 on the original argument... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Burton V. Wilmington Parking Authority et Al. |
Labor & Employment Law 131074 (Date Unkown) |
365 U.S. 715 BURTON v. WILMINGTON PARKING AUTHORITY ET AL. BURTON v. WILMINGTON PKG. AUTH., 365 U.S. 715 (1961) APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE. No. 164. Argued February 21, 23, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. Louis L. Redding argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Clair John Killoran argued the cause and filed a brief for the... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Cassell V. Texas. |
Labor & Employment Law 190846 (Date Unkown) |
339 U.S. 282 CASSELL v. TEXAS. CASSELL v. TEXAS, 339 U.S. 282 (1950) CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. No. 46. Argued November 10, 1949. Decided April 24, 1950. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed petitioner's conviction for murder. 154 Tex.Crim. , 216 S.W.2d 813. This Court granted certiorari. 336 U.S. 943. Reversed,... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Laws and Policies Related to the Eeo Complaint Process |
United States Department of Commerce (Date Unkown) |
|
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Conley et Al. V. Gibson et Al. |
Federal Banking Law Reporter 113643 (Date Unkown) |
78 S.Ct. 99 CONLEY ET AL. v. GIBSON ET AL. CONLEY v. GIBSON, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 21, 1957. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Roberson L. King, Robert L. Carter, William C. Gardner and... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Conley et Al. V. Gibson et Al. |
Federal Banking Law Reporter 113643 (Date Unkown) |
78 S.Ct. 99 CONLEY ET AL. v. GIBSON ET AL. CONLEY v. GIBSON, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 21, 1957. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Roberson L. King, Robert L. Carter, William C. Gardner and... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Conley et Al. V. Gibson et Al. |
Labor & Employment Law 114703 (Date Unkown) |
78 S.Ct. 99 CONLEY ET AL. v. GIBSON ET AL. CONLEY v. GIBSON, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 21, 1957. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Roberson L. King, Robert L. Carter, William C. Gardner and... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Conley et Al. V. Gibson et Al. |
Labor & Employment Law 114703 (Date Unkown) |
78 S.Ct. 99 CONLEY ET AL. v. GIBSON ET AL. CONLEY v. GIBSON, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 21, 1957. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Roberson L. King, Robert L. Carter, William C. Gardner and... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, DOBIE, Circuit Judges. |
County School Board of Chester-field County et Al. V. Freeman et Al. |
Federal Banking Law Reporter 306874 (Date Unkown) |
COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY et al. v. FREEMAN et al. COUNTY S. BD. OF CHESTERFIELD CTY. v. FREEMAN, 171 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1948) No. 5812.United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. December 3, 1948. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond; Sterling Hutcheson, Judge. Suit... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Eeoc V. Ford Motor Company; United Auto Workers |
JVR No. 806196, United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Docket Number N/A (Date Unkown) |
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the defendant automobile manufacturing company and the auto workers union on behalf of a class of approximately 3,400 current and former... |
|
Jury Verdicts & Settlements |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9607, Bester William Steele, Petitioner V. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et Al., Respondents., (Dec. 18, 1944) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9607 (Date Unkown) |
Bester William Steele, Petitioner v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et al., Respondents. United States Supreme Court.No. 45 , December 18, 1944, --(323 U. S. 192, 65 S. Ct. 226.). On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Reversed. Railway Labor Act; Duty of Union... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9613, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, and Ocean Lodge No. 76, and Port Norfolk Lodge No. 775, and W. M. Munden, and Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellants V. Tom Tunstall, Appellee., (Aug. 20, 1947) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9613 (Date Unkown) |
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, and Ocean Lodge No. 76, and Port Norfolk Lodge No. 775, and W. M. Munden, and Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Appellants v. Tom Tunstall, Appellee. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 5609, August 20, 1947, --(163 Fed. (2d) 289. Certiorari denied,--U. S.--.). On Appeal from... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9616, Leroy Graham, et Al., Petitioners V. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Respondent., (Nov. 07, 1949) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9616 (Date Unkown) |
Leroy Graham, et al., Petitioners v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Respondent. United States Supreme Court.No. 16. , November 7, 1949, --(338 U. S. 232.). On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Railway Labor Act--Norris-LaGuardia Act Exclusive Bargaining... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9617, John Hughes and Louis Richardson, Petitioners V. Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Contra Costa, Respondent., (May 08, 1950) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9617 (Date Unkown) |
John Hughes and Louis Richardson, Petitioners v. Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Contra Costa, Respondent. United States Supreme Court.No. 61. , May 8, 1950, --(339 U. S. 460, 70 S. Ct. 718.). On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of California. California--Picketing Freedom of Speech--Dual... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9619, Thomas E. Hayes, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants V. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, et Al., Appellee., (Aug. 30, 1950) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9619 (Date Unkown) |
Thomas E. Hayes, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, et al., Appellee. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. No. 12,509, August 30, 1950, --(184 F. (2d) 337.). On Appeal from the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Southern Division.... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9620, Oscar S. Draper V. Clark Dairy, Incorporated., (Oct. 10, 1950) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9620 (Date Unkown) |
Oscar S. Draper v. Clark Dairy, Incorporated. Connecticut, Superior Court, New Haven County. No. 73800, October 10, 1950, --(17 Conn. Sup. 93.). On Appeal from an Order of a Hearing Tribunal of the Inter-racial Commission. Enforced as Modified. Connecticut--Fair Employment Practice Law Enforcement of Orders--Necessary Parties--Applicant for... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9622, Willie J. Rolax, et Al., Appellants and Cross-appellees V. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, et Al., Appellee and Cross-appellant., (Jan. 03, 1951) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9622 (Date Unkown) |
Willie J. Rolax, et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, et al., Appellee and Cross-Appellant. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 6167, January 3, 1951, --(186 F. (2d) 473.). On Cross-Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond. Railway Labor... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9623, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et Al., Appellants V. Matt Mitchell, et Al., for and in Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Appellees., (July 11, 1951) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9623 (Date Unkown) |
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, et al., Appellants v. Matt Mitchell, et al., for and in Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, Appellees. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 13318, July 11, 1951, --(190 F. (2d) 308.). On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9625, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, an Unincorporated Association, et Al., Petitioners V. Simon L. Howard, Sr., and St. Louis-san Francisco Railway Company, Respondents., (June 09, 1952) |
Employment Practices Guide P 9625 (Date Unkown) |
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, an Unincorporated Association, et al., Petitioners v. Simon L. Howard, Sr., and St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, Respondents. United States Supreme Court. .No. 458, June 9, 1952, --(343 U. S. 768.). On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Railway Labor Act Racial... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|
|
Employment-practices 1 Epd ¶ 9627, James P. Taylor, Howard Taylor, and Charles Blake, Plaintiffs V. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, and Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Defendants., (June 25, 1 |
Employment Practices Guide P 9627 (Date Unkown) |
James P. Taylor, Howard Taylor, and Charles Blake, Plaintiffs v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees, and Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Defendants. United States District Court, District of Columbia.Civil No. 4594-51, June 25, 1952, --(106 F. Supp. 438.). Railway Labor Act Union-Shop... |
|
Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources |
|
|