Author | Title | Citation | Summary | Year | Type | Key Terms in Title or Summary | Case Status |
|
Brief for Appellants., Bibb V. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 94 (1/9/1959) |
The opinion of the statutory three-judge district court is reported as Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Bibb, 159 F. Supp. 385, and is printed in full as Appendix I to this brief, App. pp. 1... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellants., Bibb V. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 94 (1/9/1959) |
The opinion of the statutory three-judge district court is reported as Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Bibb, 159 F. Supp. 385, and is printed in full as Appendix I to this brief, App. pp. 1... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees, Harrison V. N.a.a.c.p. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 127 (3/16/1959) |
FN1. These Acts have been respectively codified in the Code of Virginia at §§18-349.9, et seq., 18-349.17 et seq., 54-74, 78, 79; 18-349.25 et seq., and 18-349.31 et seq. (R. 44).... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees, Harrison V. N.a.a.c.p. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 127 (3/16/1959) |
FN1. These Acts have been respectively codified in the Code of Virginia at §§18-349.9, et seq., 18-349.17 et seq., 54-74, 78, 79; 18-349.25 et seq., and 18-349.31 et seq. (R. 44).... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees., Bibb V. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 94 (2/19/1959) |
FN* The so-called conventional or straight splash guard which hangs perpendicular to the floor of the trailer is either permitted or required by every State except Illinois. The District... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees., Bibb V. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 94 (2/19/1959) |
FN* The so-called conventional or straight splash guard which hangs perpendicular to the floor of the trailer is either permitted or required by every State except Illinois. The District... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees., U.s. V. Raines |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 64 (11/9/1959) |
FN* It was in this case (at p. 824) that Judge Gresham said: The Federal Government can exercise only such powers as have been conferred upon it, and however reprehensible the acts... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Appellees., U.s. V. Raines |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 64 (11/9/1959) |
FN* It was in this case (at p. 824) that Judge Gresham said: The Federal Government can exercise only such powers as have been conferred upon it, and however reprehensible the acts... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Bates V. City of Little Rock |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 41 (9/18/1959) |
The opinion of the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas (R. 66-77) is reported at 319 S. W. 2d 37. The opinion was from a divided court with Justices Holt and Smith dissenting. The... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Bates V. City of Little Rock |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 41 (9/18/1959) |
The opinion of the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas (R. 66-77) is reported at 319 S. W. 2d 37. The opinion was from a divided court with Justices Holt and Smith dissenting. The... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, U.s. V. Raines |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 64 (9/30/1959) |
The opinion of the District Court (R. 24-40) is reported at 172 F. Supp. 552. The judgment of the District Court was entered on April 16, 1959 (R. 41). The jurisdictional statement was... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, U.s. V. Raines |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 64 (9/30/1959) |
The opinion of the District Court (R. 24-40) is reported at 172 F. Supp. 552. The judgment of the District Court was entered on April 16, 1959 (R. 41). The jurisdictional statement was... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief in Behalf of the State of North Carolina, Appellee., Wolfe V. North Carolina |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 7 (9/15/1959) |
The Opinion of the Supreme Court of North Carolina from which this appeal was filed is reported as STATE v. COOKE, et al, 248 N. C. 485, 103 S. E. 2d 846. This Opinion appears in the... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief in Behalf of the State of North Carolina, Appellee., Wolfe V. North Carolina |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 7 (9/15/1959) |
The Opinion of the Supreme Court of North Carolina from which this appeal was filed is reported as STATE v. COOKE, et al, 248 N. C. 485, 103 S. E. 2d 846. This Opinion appears in the... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Appellant, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (3/12/1959) |
The Supreme Court of North Carolina filed written opinion in this cause on the 9th day of April, 1958. The said opinion is reported in the following publications: 248 N.C. 102; 102 S.E. 2d... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Appellant, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (3/12/1959) |
The Supreme Court of North Carolina filed written opinion in this cause on the 9th day of April, 1958. The said opinion is reported in the following publications: 248 N.C. 102; 102 S.E. 2d... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Appellee, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (4/6/1959) |
The appellee agrees with the appellant that this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal under the provisions of 28 U. S. C. 1257 (2). The District Court's retention of jurisdiction over... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Appellee, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (4/6/1959) |
The appellee agrees with the appellant that this Court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal under the provisions of 28 U. S. C. 1257 (2). The District Court's retention of jurisdiction over... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Bureau of Information of Eastern Railways, the Association of Western Railways, and Bureau of Information of Southeastern Railways as Amici Curiae, Order of R. Telegraphers V. Chicago and North Western Railway Co. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 100 (12/28/1959) |
The Bureau of Information of the Eastern Railways, the Association of Western Railways, and the Bureau of Information of the Southeastern Railways submit this brief as amici curiae in... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Bureau of Information of Eastern Railways, the Association of Western Railways, and Bureau of Information of Southeastern Railways as Amici Curiae, Order of R. Telegraphers V. Chicago and North Western Railway Co. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 100 (12/28/1959) |
The Bureau of Information of the Eastern Railways, the Association of Western Railways, and the Bureau of Information of the Southeastern Railways submit this brief as amici curiae in... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the Attorney General of North Carolina Amicus Curiae, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (4/2/1959) |
The State of North Carolina, through its Attorney General, files this Brief as amicus curiae under the provisions of Paragraphs 4 and 5, Rule 42 of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the Attorney General of North Carolina Amicus Curiae, Lassiter V. Northampton County Bd. Of Elections |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 584 (4/2/1959) |
The State of North Carolina, through its Attorney General, files this Brief as amicus curiae under the provisions of Paragraphs 4 and 5, Rule 42 of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief on the Merits, Wolfe V. North Carolina |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 7 (8/21/1959) |
This Court having, on January 12, 1959, entered an order postponing further consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits (R 140), appellants file... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief on the Merits, Wolfe V. North Carolina |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 7 (8/21/1959) |
This Court having, on January 12, 1959, entered an order postponing further consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits (R 140), appellants file... |
1959 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brown V. State |
220 Md. 29, Court of Appeals of Maryland, Docket Number 219 (5/8/1959) |
Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree for shooting a policeman and from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, W. Laird Henry, Jr., C. J., and Rex A. Taylor, J., the defendant appeals. The Court of Appeals, Hammond, J., held that refusal to ask any questions as to bias or prejudice which the jurors might have as to a... |
1959 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Brown V. State |
220 Md. 29, Court of Appeals of Maryland, Docket Number 219 (5/8/1959) |
Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree for shooting a policeman and from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, W. Laird Henry, Jr., C. J., and Rex A. Taylor, J., the defendant appeals. The Court of Appeals, Hammond, J., held that refusal to ask any questions as to bias or prejudice which the jurors might have as to a... |
1959 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Bugh V. Webb |
231 Ark. 27, Supreme Court of Arkansas, Docket Number 5-1902 (10/19/1959) |
Action by guest against host for injuries sustained in an accident which occurred during a drag-race. From adverse judgment of the Circuit Court, Second Division, Ouachita County, Tom Marlin, J., the host and his father appealed. The Supreme Court, Ward, J., held that where automobile guest was fully cognizant of hazard of drag racing at night on a... |
1959 |
Cases |
|
This has some negative history but hasn’t been reversed
or overruled. |
|
Burton V. Wilmington Parking Authority |
38 Del.Ch. 266, Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle (4/15/1959) |
Action for declaratory judgment in form of injunctive relief against operator of restaurant in public building, to require operator to refrain from refusing to serve plaintiff solely... |
1959 |
Trial Court Orders |
|
This is no longer good law for at least one of the points of law it contains. |
|
Burton V. Wilmington Parking Authority |
38 Del.Ch. 266, Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle (4/15/1959) |
Action for declaratory judgment in form of injunctive relief against operator of restaurant in public building, to require operator to refrain from refusing to serve plaintiff solely... |
1959 |
Trial Court Orders |
|
This is no longer good law for at least one of the points of law it contains. |
|
Carter V. Mccarthy's Cafe, Inc. |
Not Reported in N.W.2d, District Court of Minnesota, Fourth Judicial, Docket Number 532616 (6/29/1959) |
Due to the long delay in this case the Court feels that a chronological history of the proceedings might tend to clarify some of the reasons for such delay. These proceedings arose out of a... |
1959 |
Trial Court Orders |
|
|