Author | Title | Citation | Summary | Year | Type | Key Terms in Title or Summary | Case Status |
|
Brief for Petitioner, Lightfoot V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 4 (8/23/1956) |
The opinion of the Court of Appeals (R. 619) is reported at 228 F. 2d 861. FN1. R. refers to the printed record. G. Ex. designates an exhibit offered by the prosecution and D. Ex. an... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioner, Rowoldt V. Perfetto |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 5 (9/7/1956) |
The opinion of the Court of Appeals (R. 38-41) is reported at 228 F. 2d 109. The opinion of the District Court (R. 35-8) has not been reported. The jurisdiction of the Court rests on 28 U.... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioner, Rowoldt V. Perfetto |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 5 (9/7/1956) |
The opinion of the Court of Appeals (R. 38-41) is reported at 228 F. 2d 109. The opinion of the District Court (R. 35-8) has not been reported. The jurisdiction of the Court rests on 28 U.... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (9/17/1956) |
The majority and dissenting opinions of the Court of Appeals (Cert. App. A ) are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The opinion of the trial court (III R. 252-262), dismissing certain pre-trial... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (9/17/1956) |
The majority and dissenting opinions of the Court of Appeals (Cert. App. A ) are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The opinion of the trial court (III R. 252-262), dismissing certain pre-trial... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Yates V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 6 (10/1/1956) |
The opinion of the Court of Appeals [Clk. R. 105] is reported at 225 F. 2d 146. The written opinions of the District Court are reported in 102 F. Supp. 87; 104 F. Supp. 405; 106 F. Supp.... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for Petitioners, Yates V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 6 (10/1/1956) |
The opinion of the Court of Appeals [Clk. R. 105] is reported at 225 F. 2d 146. The written opinions of the District Court are reported in 102 F. Supp. 87; 104 F. Supp. 405; 106 F. Supp.... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the Petitioner, William Earl Fikes V. Alabama |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 53 (10/11/1956) |
The opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama is reported at 81 So. 2d 303. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama was entered on May 12, 1955. Petition for rehearing was denied June... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the Petitioner, William Earl Fikes V. Alabama |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 53 (10/11/1956) |
The opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama is reported at 81 So. 2d 303. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama was entered on May 12, 1955. Petition for rehearing was denied June... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (10/2/1956) |
The opinion and dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The trial court's opinion overruling pre-trial motions is reported at 13 F. R. D. 180. The... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (10/2/1956) |
Note: Table of Authorities page numbers missing in original document The opinion and dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The trial court's opinion... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (10/2/1956) |
The opinion and dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The trial court's opinion overruling pre-trial motions is reported at 13 F. R. D. 180. The... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief for the United States, Mesarosh V. U.s. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 20 (10/2/1956) |
Note: Table of Authorities page numbers missing in original document The opinion and dissenting opinion of the Court of Appeals are reported at 223 F. 2d 449. The trial court's opinion... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc., Mary Harper, et Al., and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program, ex Parte Governor Donald Siegelman, et Al., in Re: Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc., et Al., Plaintiffs-appellees, V. Donald Siegelman, in H |
Supreme Court of Alabama, Docket Number No. 1950030 (8/22/1956) |
FN1. The term Equity Funding Case is an unfortunate shorthand designation that does not accurately describe this litigation. This designation does not appropriately convey that the... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc., Mary Harper, et Al., and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program, ex Parte Governor Donald Siegelman, et Al., in Re: Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc., et Al., Plaintiffs-appellees, V. Donald Siegelman, in H |
Supreme Court of Alabama, Docket Number No. 1950030 (8/22/1956) |
FN1. The term Equity Funding Case is an unfortunate shorthand designation that does not accurately describe this litigation. This designation does not appropriately convey that the... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Robert L. Hanson, et Al., Individual Appellees, Railway Employes' Dept. V. Hanson |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 451 (4/18/1956) |
Note: Table of Authorities page numbers missing in original document FN1. Footnote p. 17, Appellants' brief, and their arguing only no governmental action. FN2. United States v. Congress... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of Robert L. Hanson, et Al., Individual Appellees, Railway Employes' Dept. V. Hanson |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 451 (4/18/1956) |
Note: Table of Authorities page numbers missing in original document FN1. Footnote p. 17, Appellants' brief, and their arguing only no governmental action. FN2. United States v. Congress... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the City of Columbia, S. C. Amicus Curiae, South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co. V. Flemming |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 511 (1/9/1956) |
This brief in behalf of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, as an amicus curiae, in opposition to Appellee's Motion to Affirm in this cause, is filed under the provisions of Rule 42(4) of... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the City of Columbia, S. C. Amicus Curiae, South Carolina Elec. & Gas Co. V. Flemming |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 511 (1/9/1956) |
This brief in behalf of the City of Columbia, South Carolina, as an amicus curiae, in opposition to Appellee's Motion to Affirm in this cause, is filed under the provisions of Rule 42(4) of... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the Sandsberry Petitioners as Amicus Curiae., Railway Employes' Dept. V. Hanson |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 451 (4/18/1956) |
This brief as amicus curiae is filed with the consent of the parties and pursuant to rule 42(2) of the Rules of this Court by a group of individual employees of the Santa Fe Railroad, some... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief of the Sandsberry Petitioners as Amicus Curiae., Railway Employes' Dept. V. Hanson |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 451 (4/18/1956) |
This brief as amicus curiae is filed with the consent of the parties and pursuant to rule 42(2) of the Rules of this Court by a group of individual employees of the Santa Fe Railroad, some... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief Opposing Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Booker V. State of Tennessee Bd. Of Educ. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 692 (5/19/1956) |
MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: These respondents, the Tennessee State Board of Education and the other defendants to the original suit in the District Court of the United States for the Western... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Brief Opposing Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Booker V. State of Tennessee Bd. Of Educ. |
Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Number No. 692 (5/19/1956) |
MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT: These respondents, the Tennessee State Board of Education and the other defendants to the original suit in the District Court of the United States for the Western... |
1956 |
Briefs |
|
|
|
Central Amusement Co. V. District of Columbia |
121 A.2d 865, Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Docket Number 1753 (4/3/1956) |
Prosecution on charge that defendant violated act prohibiting persons who have obtained license for conducting place of public amusement of any kind from making any distinction on account of race or color. A judgment of conviction was entered in the Municipal Court for the District of Columbia, Criminal Division, and the defendant appealed. The... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Chesley V. Jones |
81 Ariz. 1, Supreme Court of Arizona, Docket Number 6193 (6/26/1956) |
Mandamus directed to the defendants school board commanding them to execute a new contract of teachers employment with the plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff in the Superior Court of Pinal County, Robert S. Tullar, J., and the defendants appealed. The Supreme Court, Phelps, J., held that where school board expressly stated that it would not renew a... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Chesley V. Jones |
81 Ariz. 1, Supreme Court of Arizona, Docket Number 6193 (6/26/1956) |
Mandamus directed to the defendants school board commanding them to execute a new contract of teachers employment with the plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff in the Superior Court of Pinal County, Robert S. Tullar, J., and the defendants appealed. The Supreme Court, Phelps, J., held that where school board expressly stated that it would not renew a... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Conn V. State |
228 Miss. 833, Supreme Court of Mississippi, Docket Number 40075 (10/15/1956) |
Defendant was convicted of grand larceny by operation of a confidence game. The Circuit Court, Hinds County, Leon F. Hendricks, Chancellor, entered judgment, and defendant appealed. The Supreme Court, Kyle, J., held that where statement, which alleged co-conspirator of defendant made to detective at police station in presence of defendant, was in... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Conn V. State |
228 Miss. 833, Supreme Court of Mississippi, Docket Number 40075 (10/15/1956) |
Defendant was convicted of grand larceny by operation of a confidence game. The Circuit Court, Hinds County, Leon F. Hendricks, Chancellor, entered judgment, and defendant appealed. The Supreme Court, Kyle, J., held that where statement, which alleged co-conspirator of defendant made to detective at police station in presence of defendant, was in... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
Constantian V. Anson County |
244 N.C. 221, Supreme Court of North Carolina, Docket Number 463 (6/6/1956) |
Action to enjoin issuance and sale of school bonds. The Superior Court, Anson County, Frank M. Armstrong, J., denied the relief sought, and plaintiff appealed. The Supreme Court, Bobbitt, J., recognized that federal Supreme Court decision was authoritative in jurisdiction and that mandatory requirement as to enforced separation of races in public... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|
|
County School Bd. Of Hanover County V. Shelton |
198 Va. 226, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (6/18/1956) |
Suit to enjoin county school board from expending proceeds from sale of school bonds for any purpose other than those for which issuance of such bonds was authorized. The Circuit Court of Hanover County, Leon M. Bazile, J., rendered a decree granting an injunction, and defendant school board appealed. The Supreme Court of Appeals, Whittle, J., held... |
1956 |
Cases |
|
|