AuthorTitleCitationSummaryYearTypeKey Terms in Title or SummaryCase Status
  Seal V. State 28 Tex. 491, Supreme Court of Texas (January 01, 1866) It is not the duty of the judge to give instructions to the jury, which, though correct as abstract principles of law, are not authorized by the evidence. Where the record contains charges asked by the appellant, but does not show whether they were given or refused, and the refusal of them is not assigned for error, it is to be presumed that they... 1866 Cases    
  Smith V. Payne 2 Bush 583, Court of Appeals of Kentucky (October 05, 1866) James Robinson, by his last will and testament, which was admitted to record by the county court of Albemarle county, Virginia, in March, 1820, made the following disposition of his property: I give the whole of my estate, both real and personal, to my wife, Sally Robinson, to be possessed and disposed of by her, for her own use and the use of our... 1866 Cases    
  Thurmond V. Trammell 28 Tex. 371, Supreme Court of Texas (October 01, 1866) To repel the defense of the statute of limitation, in actions for the recovery of specific personal property, evidence of verbal acknowledgments by the defendant of the plaintiff's title to the property may be sufficient for the purpose of showing that his claim and possession were not adverse to the plaintiff or that he recognized the title of the... 1866 Cases    
  U. S. V. Rhodes 1 Abb.U.S. 28, Circuit Court, D. Kentucky (January 01, 1866) Motion in arrest of judgment. 1866 Cases    
  Walton V. Compton & Strother 28 Tex. 569, Supreme Court of Texas (January 01, 1866) The 23d section of the act of the 27th of January, 1842, about executions, reads as follows: If any sheriff or other officer shall fail to make return of any execution received by him on the day and at the place the same shall be made returnable, or shall neglect or fail to make a levy when in his power so to do, being thereto required by... 1866 Cases    
  Weathersly V. Weathersly 40 Miss. 462, High Court of Errors and Appeals of Mississippi (April 01, 1866) 1. MORTGAGE: CONDITIONAL SALE.-The difference between a mortgage and conditional sale is, that in a mortgage, though the time of payment be past, there is an equity of redemption, which continues until foreclosed or barred by the Statute of Limitations; in a conditional sale, if the condition of payment is not complied with at or before the time... 1866 Cases    
  Witherby V. State 39 Ala. 702, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1866) [INDICTMENT FOR ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO RAVISH.] FROM the Circuit Court of Barbour. Tried before the Hon. J. MCCALEB WILEY. 1866 Cases    
  Adams V. Adams 39 Ala. 603, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1865) [PETITION BY WIDOW FOR ALLOTMENT OF DOWER.] APPEAL from the Probate Court of Dallas. 1865 Cases    
  Authority of General Saxton in Department of the South. 11 U.S. Op. Atty. Gen. 149, U.S.A.G (January 30, 1865)   1865 Administrative Decisions & Guidance    
  Brothers V. State 42 Tenn. 201, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1865) This is an indictment in the circuit court of Rutherford county against Charles Brothers, a free man of color, as laid in the indictment, for horse stealing. The jury found a verdict of guilty, and fixed the term of the prisoner's confinement in the penitentiary for three years. There was a motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court,... 1865 Cases    
  Brown V. Bibb 42 Tenn. 434, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1865) The writ of error is prosecuted to reverse the judgment in two actions, instituted by Philemon W. Bibb, Sarah H. Anderson, and Susan C. Webb, on the 30th of April, 1859--the one against Josiah G. Brown and the other against Ellen D. Hough. The form of both actions is debt, with the indebitatus assumpsit and quantum valebat counts, the former for... 1865 Cases    
  Bruce V. Levering 23 Md. 288, Court of Appeals of Maryland (July 08, 1865) The facts, upon which the questions in this case depend, are these: An execution, issued on a judgment obtained by Levering, one of the appellees, against Daniel C. Bruce, was levied on certain chattels and household stuff previously conveyed or mortgaged by him to the appellants, who thereupon filed their bill, and obtained an injunction... 1865 Cases    
  Carter's Heirs V. Carter's Adm'rs 39 Ala. 579, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1865) [FINAL SETTLEMENT OF DECEDENT'S ESTATE.] APPEAL from the Probate Court of Clarke. 1865 Cases    
  Curry V. Lackey 35 Mo. 389, Supreme Court of Missouri (January 01, 1865) I. The Circuit Court committed no error in refusing to sustain the defendant's demurrer to the plaintiff's petition. II. The Circuit Court committed no error in refusing to sustain defendant's objection or demurrer to the reading to the jury of Exhibit B. This was no arbitration, and hence no statutory procedure. An arbitration is... 1865 Cases    
  Hall V. Mclauren 17 La.Ann. 35, Supreme Court of Louisiana (May 01, 1865) Appeal from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Eggleston, J. 1865 Cases    
  Irwin V. Chrisman 42 Tenn. 501, Supreme Court of Tennessee (December 01, 1865) This bill and cross bill were filed in the chancery court of DeKalb. It appears from the facts stated in the original bill, Daniel Smith, on the 11th of December, 1847, executed and delivered a deed of gift to the complainant, as follows: For the love and affection I bear my sister, Sarah Irwin, I do hereby give, transfer and convey, during... 1865 Cases    
  Mitchell's Claim. 11 U.S. Op. Atty. Gen. 241, U.S.A.G (June 02, 1865)   1865 Administrative Decisions & Guidance    
  Siegwald V. Siegwald 37 Ill. 430, Supreme Court of Illinois (April 01, 1865) The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of restraining plaintiff in error from selling certain real estate described in the bill. The whole controversy arises on the construction of the last will of David Siegwald, from whom both parties claim title. The clause of the will under which the question in dispute arises, is this: I give and... 1865 Cases    
  Smith V. State 39 Ala. 554, Supreme Court of Alabama (January 01, 1865) [INDICTMENT FOR LIVING IN ADULTERY OR FORNICATION.] FROM the Circuit Court of Butler. Tried before the Hon. JOHN K. HENRY. 1865 Cases    
  Thomas V. Thomas 42 Tenn. 123, Supreme Court of Tennessee (September 01, 1865) This is a distressing picture of domestic life. The parties are shown to have been of irreproachable character, of high social position, surrounded with all that wealth can add to render home attractive; both reputable professors of the Christian faith; children and friends, theirs; to all outward observation, kind and affectionate in their... 1865 Cases    
  U.s. V. Dashiel 70 U.S. 688, Supreme Court of the United States (December 01, 1865) THE United States brought suit at common lawdebt on bondfor $20,085.74 against Major Dashiel, a paymaster in the army of the United States, and his sureties. Dashiel denied every part of the demand, but claimed specially a deduction of $13,000 from the sum sued for, on the ground that while travelling in remote regions... 1865 Cases    
BLACKDOUGLASBURTONFRANKFURTERCLARKREEDJACKSONMINTONWaiteMillerBradleyHolmesKennerly ¶ 282,007 Terry et Al. V. Adams et Al. Health Care Compliance Reporter 282007 (Date Unkown) 345 U.S. 461 TERRY ET AL. v. ADAMS ET AL. TERRY v. ADAMS, 345 U.S. 461 (1953) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 52. Argued January 16, 1953. Decided May 4, 1953. The District Court issued a declaratory judgment holding invalid racial discriminations in a preprimary election in a Texas County, declined to...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
SARAFITE ¶ 50,868 Delaney, Petitioner V. Conway, Respondent. Labor & Employment Law 50868 (Date Unkown) Delaney, Petitioner v. Conway, Respondent. 47 LC ¶ 50,868. Supreme Court, 1st Judicial District (New York). 149 N. Y. L. J., June 6, 1963 page 16.. SARAFITE, J.: This is a proceeding to set aside an order issued by the New York State Commission for Human Rights, except so much thereof as dismissed charges of unlawful discriminatory practice alleged...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
  ¶ 55,201 Myer J. Lichterman, Individually and Doing Business as Artistic Cleaners and Dyers, Respondent, V. Laundry and Dry Cleaning Drivers Union Local No. 131, et Al., Appellants. Trade Regulation Reporter (Trade Cases) 55201 (Date Unkown) Myer J. Lichterman, individually and doing business as Artistic Cleaners and Dyers, Respondent, v. Laundry and Dry Cleaning Drivers Union Local No. 131, et al., Appellants. 1932-1939 Trade Cases ¶ 55,201. Supreme Court of Minnesota. Filed December 9, 1938. 282 NW 689 The Minnesota Unfair Trade Practices Act, prohibiting price discrimination and...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
PECK, BREITEL, BOTEIN, RABIN, FRANK ¶ 70,684 Wendell A. Jeanpierre, Petitioner-appellant, V. Ward B. Arbury, Elmer A. Carter, J. Edward Conway, Nicholas H. Pinto and Caroline K. Simon, as Members of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Respondents-respondents. Labor & Employment Law 70684 (Date Unkown) Wendell A. Jeanpierre, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ward B. Arbury, Elmer A. Carter, J. Edward Conway, Nicholas H. Pinto and Caroline K. Simon, as Members of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Respondents-Respondents. 32 LC ¶ 70,684. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. May 7, 1957( 3 App. Div. (2d) 514.)....   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
PECK, BREITEL, BOTEIN, RABIN, FRANK ¶ 70,684 Wendell A. Jeanpierre, Petitioner-appellant, V. Ward B. Arbury, Elmer A. Carter, J. Edward Conway, Nicholas H. Pinto and Caroline K. Simon, as Members of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Respondents-respondents. Labor & Employment Law 70684 (Date Unkown) Wendell A. Jeanpierre, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ward B. Arbury, Elmer A. Carter, J. Edward Conway, Nicholas H. Pinto and Caroline K. Simon, as Members of the State Commission Against Discrimination, Respondents-Respondents. 32 LC ¶ 70,684. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department. May 7, 1957( 3 App. Div. (2d) 514.)....   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
  ¶ 72,526 Todd V. Joint Apprenticeship Committee of Steel Workers of Chicago CCH Government Contracts Reports P 72526 (Date Unkown) Todd v. Joint Apprenticeship Committee of Steel Workers of Chicago GOV-CONT ¶ 72,526. , January 1, 1963 Blacks excluded by union could not enforce anti-discrimination contract clause.-- Blacks who had been systematically excluded from job opportunities by a union and its joint apprenticeship committee could not enforce the Nondiscrimination clause...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
  ¶ 93,302 Administrative Order Directing Sale of Fha-insured Home Declared Void--washington Antidiscrimination Law Held Unconstitutional. Federal Banking Law Reporter 93302 (Date Unkown) ¶ 93,302. Digest of opinion of Washington Supreme Court in O'Meara v. The Washington State Board Against Discrimination, September 29, 1961. Administrative Order Directing Sale of FHA-Insured Home Declared Void--Washington Antidiscrimination Law Held Unconstitutional.--Owners of a home financed with a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
MOORESUTTONFRANTZDOYLEBlack ¶ 9666 Colorado Anti-discrimination Commission, et Al., Plaintiffs in Error V. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Defendant in Error. Labor & Employment Law 9666 (Date Unkown) Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission, et al., Plaintiffs in Error v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Defendant in Error. 1 EPD ¶ 9666. Supreme Court of Colorado. No. 19215. August 15, 1960,(Colo., 355 P. (2d) 83.). Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, Charles S. Thomas and Robert L. Nagel, Assistant...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
  ¶ 9666 Colorado Anti-discrimination Commission, et Al., Plaintiffs in Error V. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Defendant in Error. Employment Practices Guide P 9666 (Date Unkown) Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission, et al., Plaintiffs in Error v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Defendant in Error. 1 EPD ¶ 9666. Supreme Court of Colorado. No. 19215. August 15, 1960,(Colo., 355 P. (2d) 83.). Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, Charles S. Thomas and Robert L. Nagel, Assistant...   Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources Yes  
233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244