AuthorTitleCitationDocument TypeCase StatusSummaryYearRelevancy
Graham Mayeda Where Should Johannesburg Take Us? Ethical and Legal Approaches to Sustainable Development in the Context of International Environmental Law 15 Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 29 (Winter 2004) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   On September 4, 2002, the World Summit on Sustainable Development adopted The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development (Johannesburg Declaration), reaffirming international support for the principle of sustainable development. Though not a treaty, the Johannesburg Declaration is nevertheless indicative of an emerging commitment to... 2004  
Mihaela Popescu , Oscar H. Gandy, Jr. Whose Environmental Justice? Social Identity and Institutional Rationality 19 Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation 141 (Spring 2004) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   The recent decision in Alexander v. Sandoval has seriously limited the available opportunities for minorities to argue their claims for environmental justice. Prior to Sandoval, plaintiffs alleging disparate impact as a result of the policies implemented by a federally funded agency met with moderate success under Title VI section 602. After... 2004  
Jamie S. Jeffords Will Japan Face its Past? The Struggle for Justice for Former Comfort Women 2 Regent Journal of International Law 145 (2003-2004) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   Among the approximately fifty military tribunals convened in various locations throughout what had been the Pacific Theatre of World War II during the period of 1945-1951, only one addressed the issue of forced sexual slavery. This tribunal, conducted in 1948 by the Dutch in what is now Jakarta, Indonesia, prosecuted the forced sexual servitude of... 2004  
Beth Van Schaack With All Deliberate Speed: Civil Human Rights Litigation as a Tool for Social Change 57 Vanderbilt Law Review 2305 (November, 2004) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   I. ATCA-Style Litigation as Public Impact Litigation. 2308 II. The Impact of Human Rights Litigation in United States Courts. 2317 A. On Plaintiffs and Their Communities. 2318 B. On Defendants and Potential Defendants. 2326 C. On the Human Rights Corpus. 2334 D. On Other Processes of Social Change. 2338 III. Conclusion. 2347 2004  
  Amended Complaint for Damages: Employment Discrimination (Ca Government Code Sec. 12900 et Seq.), Racial Discrimination, Racial Harassment; Failure to Prevent Racial Discrimination; Retaliation; Hostile Workplace; and Violations of United States' Civ Il R (3/15/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiff CLEVELAND PRINCE alleges as follows: 1. CLEVELAND PRINCE, an African-American employee with the PROBATION DEPARTMENT OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, brings this action to vindicate... 2004  
  Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (4/30/2004) Trial Court Documents   The EEOC brings this suit on behalf of Sedgerik Lee, claiming that Lee was subjected to racial harassment during a portion of his employment with American Electric Power Company (AEP). In... 2004  
  Complaint (12/16/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiff Raymond Bey, 2725 Winslow Road, Williamstown, New Jersey 08094 Defendants Daimlerchrysler Services of North America, LLC (DaimlerChrysler Services) is a result of a merger with... 2004  
  Complaint (With Jury Demand) (7/29/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiff, MAKRO CAPITAL OF AMERICA INC, (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff) by its/their attorneys ALEXANDER REUS ESQ., as and for their complaint allege the following based upon... 2004  
  Complaint for Damages, Declaratory, Injunctive and Equitable Relief (1/7/2004) Trial Court Documents   Upon information and belief, Plaintiff, on behalf of himself, on behalf of his Ancestors, on behalf of all person similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, states as follows:... 2004  
  Complaint with Jury Demand (3/29/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiffs, by their attorneys, for their complaint against defendants, upon information and belief, state the following: 1. During the period from early 1600s to the end of the 1800s,... 2004  
  Declaration of Michelle Natividad Rodriguez in Support of Petitioners' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Against Mercury Insurance Group Ýc.c.p. | 425.16 (C)⨠(4/20/2004) Trial Court Documents   Date: May 21, 2004 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 85 I, Michelle Natividad Rodriguez, declare: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice in California, employed as the attorney law fellow by Public... 2004  
  Defendant the Titan Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (10/12/2004) Trial Court Documents   COMES NOW defendant The Titan Corporation (Titan), by and through undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves the Court to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil... 2004  
  Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint (4/26/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint (Second Amended Complaint or SAC), like their prior dismissed complaint, fails on multiple legal grounds. Defendants Aetna Inc.,... 2004  
  Defendant's Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (8/31/2004) Trial Court Documents   FN1. The number of factual assertions and theories in the 71-page Opposition necessitates a rather lengthy reply. Given that the United States' motion presents a factual challenge to... 2004  
  Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (4/30/2004) Trial Court Documents   On January 17, 2003, Plaintiff, Jerald Boykin (hereinafter Plaintiff), filed a Complaint alleging that, while employed with the City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge (hereinafter... 2004  
  Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Motion of Defendants Caci International Inc, Caci Inc. - Federal, and Caci N.v. to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (9/10/2004) Trial Court Documents   FN1. Consistent with Plaintiffs' failure to conduct any reasonable prefiling inquiry as to the truth of their allegations, Plaintiffs have not even sued the CACI entity that actually... 2004  
  Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Motion of Defendants Caci International Inc, Caci Inc.-federal, and Caci N.v. to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (9/13/2004) Trial Court Documents   FN1. Consistent with Plaintiffs' failure to conduct any reasonable prefiling inquiry as to the truth of their allegations, Plaintiffs have not even sued the CACI entity that actually... 2004  
  Motion of Defendants Caci International Inc, Caci, Inc. - Federal, and Caci N.v. to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (10/12/2004) Trial Court Documents   Defendants CACI International Inc, CACI, INC. - FEDERAL, and CACI N.V. (collectively, the CACI Defendants) hereby move to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil... 2004  
  Opposition of Defendants Xelan Investment Services, Inc., Xelan Annuity Co., Ltd., and Xelan Administrative Services, Inc. to Application to Motion for Preliminary Injunciton Appointment of Receiver and Repatriation of Foreign Assets (11/19/2004) Trial Court Documents   The complaint is brought under two statutes, 18 U.S.C. § 1345 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402, which provide this Court with authority to enter injunctions in fraud cases and tax cases, respectively.... 2004  
  Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's, Response to Defendant, American Electric Power's Motion for Summary Judgment -2004 Trial Court Documents   This is a race harassment case brought by the EEOC on behalf of Sedgerick Lee, an employee of the Defendant, American Electric Power (Defendant or AEP). The record reflects that three... 2004  
  Plaintiff's Answer to ""Defendant Richard Latender's Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (4/26/2004) Trial Court Documents   The Plaintiff did receive the head dated April 08th, 2004 on Monday - April 12th - 2004. These would be the Plaintiff's neutral and succinct responses to the salient facts and law the... 2004  
  Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint (5/17/2004) Trial Court Documents   Inury-in-Fact: A present day injury has been suffered by all named plaintiffs. It is neither speculative, nor conjectural. Defendants cannot contend that the plaintiffs, descendants of... 2004  
  Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant City of Tulsa's Motion to Dismiss, Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support (1/6/2004) Trial Court Documents   No one contests that what has become known as the Tulsa Race Riot occurred in 1921, and that this action would be barred if it was not subject to equitable doctrines that govern the accrual... 2004  
  Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant City of Tulsa's Motion to Dismiss, Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. (2/23/2004) Trial Court Documents   The political question doctrine is a narrow body of law rooted in separation of powers principles. See Powell v. McCormack, 395 U.S. 486, 517 (1969); See also 13A Charles Alan Wright &... 2004  
  Reply Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (7/6/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiff, unable to cite to admissible record evidence supporting its claims, relies on a litany of inflammatory statements and unsupported assertions to oppose Defendant's motion for... 2004  
  Reply in Support of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint (6/7/2004) Trial Court Documents   Ignoring this Court's prior ruling, Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint merely re-argues the... 2004  
  Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment - Statute of Limitations (5/28/2004) Trial Court Documents   This document relates to: All Cases FN1. Courts have dismissed literally millions of claims as time-barred in other contexts as well. See, e.g., African-American Slave Descendants Litig.,... 2004  
  Reply in Support of Iran's Objections to the Magistrate's Order Denying Iran's Motion for Stay (5/2/2004) Trial Court Documents   The principal issue posed by Iran's Objections is whether the Court's January 23, 2004, Order is appealable pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. If it is, we think McKesson would... 2004  
  Reply in Support of Iran's Objections to the Magistrate's Order Denying Iran's Motion for Stay (5/4/2004) Trial Court Documents   The principal issue posed by Iran's Objections is whether the Court's January 23, 2004, Order is appealable pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. If it is, we think McKesson would... 2004  
  Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (4/5/2004) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves, their enslaved ancestors, and all other persons similarly situated, by and through their attorneys, complaining against the Defendants as follows: 1.... 2004  
  Executive Summary JCX- 53-03 NO 2 (5/19/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Fact Sheet Justice Department Cracks down on Tax Fraud DOJ 03-232 (4/11/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Federal Court in Colorado Bars Nationwide "Expatriation" Tax Scam DOJ 03-601 (11/3/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Federal Court in Colorado Bars Nationwide "Expatriation" Tax Scam (11/3/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Hamilton, Glenda F. v. Department of the Treasury (10/8/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Ii. Providing Top Quality Service to All Taxpayers JCX- 53-03 NO 4 (5/19/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Irs Updates the 'Dirty Dozen' for 2003: Agency Warns of 12 Common Scams IR- 2003-18 (2/19/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Justice Department Sues to Halt Georgia Man's Alleged Tax Scam DOJ 03-223 (4/10/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  News Release (10/23/2003) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2003  
  Answer to Petition for Review (4/7/2003) Briefs   The decision below is fully in accord with the only other reported decisions by American courts regarding the Treaty's resolution of World War II forced labor claims. In In re World War II... 2003  
  Appellant's Initial Brief (6/23/2003) Briefs   This Court has appellate jurisdiction to review a final judgment of the United States District Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Must political question deference be given to an... 2003  
  Brief for the National Foreign Trade Council, Usa*engage, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the United States Council for International Business as Amici Curiae in Support of Petit Ione (10/6/2003) Briefs   FN1. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.6, amici curiae state that no counsel for any petitioner or respondent authored this brief in whole or in part. No person or entity, other than amici... 2003  
  Brief of Appellant (10/27/2003) Briefs   STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION This is a direct appeal from a final order and judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Guin, J.), dismissing sua... 2003  
  Brief of Appellee (12/5/2003) Briefs   The appellant, Richard E. Lake, appeals from a final order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama dismissing his § 1983 claim sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. §... 2003  
  Brief of Plaintiffs-appellees Green Party, et Al. (12/9/2003) Briefs   The evidentiary record in this case is notable in two respects. First, the District Court's fact-finding was exhaustive, including two all-day hearings featuring searching questions from... 2003  
  Brief of Respondents in Opposition (8/5/2003) Briefs   Petitioners in these related cases (Nos. 02-1776, 02-1784) offer no plausible reason why this Court should review the decision below. The judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth... 2003  
  Joint Appendix (2/24/2003) Briefs   FN* For the Court's convenience, the docket entries have been revised and reworded to reflect more clearly the actual entries in the district court's docket. Separate dockets were... 2003  
  Joint Brief on the Merits of Appellees Emily Echols and Barret Austin O'brock, et Al., Urging Affirmance of the Judgment That Bcra Section 318 Is Unconstitutional (Final Version) (7/8/2003) Briefs   BCRA: Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act FECA: Federal Election Campaign Act FEC: Federal Election Commission FEC JS: Jurisdictional Statement of the FEC, et al. FEC Resp.: FEC Response to... 2003  
  Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (6/2/2003) Briefs   FN1. Kim v. Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Indus. Co., Ltd., No. CV-99-05303-VRW. FN2. Choe v. Nippon Steel Corp., et al., No. CV-99-05309-VRW. FN3. Sin v. Mitsui & Co., Ltd., et al., No.... 2003  
  Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (7/8/2003) Briefs   Judgment (Without Opinion) from The United Stales Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 11 April 2003. #02-5134 Obadele v. United States, Obadele v. United States, 52 Fed.Cl. 432... 2003  
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62