AuthorTitleCitationDocument TypeCase StatusSummaryYearRelevancy
  Reply in Support of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss (10/28/2003) Trial Court Documents   FN1. This reply applies to all of the actions in these MDL proceedings, including the separate complaint filed by Chester and Timothy Hurdle against 10 of the defendants (Hurdle Compl.).... 2003  
  Second Amended Complaint For: (1) Deprivation of Life and Liberty and the Privileges and Immunities of United States Citizenship in Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.s. Constitution; (2) Deprivation of Property and Privileges and Immunities o (4/29/2003) Trial Court Documents   Plaintiffs JOHN MELVIN ALEXANDER et al. allege as follows: 1. This action arises under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; the Civil Rights Act of April 9,... 2003  
  United States' Response to James's July 21, 2003 Letter to the Court (8/11/2003) Trial Court Documents   The United States responds to James's July 21, 2003, letter to the Court as follows: The Court should not treat James's letter of July 21, 2003, as a motion to compel because 1) James has... 2003  
  United States' Response to James's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel and Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (7/11/2003) Trial Court Documents   The United States opposes defendant James's request for appointment of counsel because James cannot meet the exceptional circumstances standard for appointment of counsel in a civil case.... 2003  
  I. Providing Top Quality Service to Each Taxpayer JCX- 38-02 NO 3 (5/10/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Irs Sets New Audit Priorities FS- 2002-12 (9/1/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Justice Department Obtains Injunction Against Georgia Tax Return Preparers DOJ 02-678 (11/15/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  New Tax Scams Page Debuts on Irs.gov IR- 2002-61 (5/8/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer (4/1/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer (5/3/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer (5/9/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Press Briefing by Ari Fleischer (8/1/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Senegal (3/1/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Service Center Advisory IRS SCA 200225004 (6/21/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Service Center Advisory IRS SCA 200226044 (6/28/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  The 'Dirty Dozen': Irs Warns of 12 Common Scams IR- 2002-12 (1/31/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Witnesses JCS- 4-02 NO 3 (5/14/2002) Administrative Decisions & Guidance     2002  
  Appellants' Brief (6/3/2002) Briefs   This appeal is taken from a Judgment upon a Memorandum and Order of the Honorable Sterling Johnson, Jr. of the Eastern District of New York dated September 28, 2001 (the 9/28/01 Order)... 2002  
  Appellants' Reply Brief (9/30/2002) Briefs   FN1. Operation Rescue of California is generally referred to in this brief as Operation Rescue. The recitation of facts in the Respondent's brief contains a number of misleading and... 2002  
  Appellant's Reply Brief (3/14/2002) Briefs   FN1. On January 30, 2002, 14 Japanese corporations and their American subsidiaries, which face civil liability based on their use of slave labor during World War II, filed a proposed amicus... 2002  
  Appellees' Merits Brief for Groups 1, 2 & 3 (5/31/2002) Briefs   American-Turkish Commission Report American-Turkish Commission, American-Turkish Claims Settlement under the Agreement of December 24, 1923, and Supplemental Agreements between the United... 2002  
  Brief for Amicus Curiae the United States of America Concerning Group 4 in in Support of Affirmance (6/13/2002) Briefs   The Constitution assigns to the Federal Government exclusive responsibility for conducting the nation's foreign policy. At the conclusion of World War II, the President and Senate... 2002  
  Brief for Appellee (10/25/2002) Briefs   Term Definition L1-2 FSIA Foreign Sovereign Imunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1602 et seq. L1-2 ATCA Alien Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 Note: Table of Contents page numbers missing... 2002  
  Brief for the Appellee (5/31/2002) Briefs   On November 20, 2001, the United States filed a complaint for recovery of an erroneous refund and for injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of... 2002  
  Brief of Appellant (5/1/2002) Briefs   Your APPELLANTS, CRYSTAL FOSTER AND ROBERT POSTER, by and through Counsel, present the following BRIEF in support of their strong objection to the ruling by THE HONORABLE RICHARD L.... 2002  
  Brief of Appellants and Joint Appendix (8/27/2002) Briefs   Appellants IMARI A. OBADELE and KURATIBISHA X ALI RASHID (appellants) were claimants for redress payments under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, (The Act) 50 App. U.S.C. § 1989b.... 2002  
  Brief of Appellees the Turner Corporation and Kitchell Corporation (1/24/2002) Briefs   Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendants and appellees The Turner Corporation (Turner) and Kitchell Corporation (Kitchell) state that defendant... 2002  
  Brief of Defendant-appellee, the United States (11/15/2002) Briefs   Counsel for defendant-appellee is unaware of any other appeal in or from the proceeding below that previously was before this or any other appellate court under the same or similar title.... 2002  
  Brief of Defendants - Appellees (6/28/2002) Briefs   Oral argument should be denied because (1) the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and (2) the decisional process would not be significantly aided by... 2002  
  Brief of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, American Chemistry Council, American Council of Life Insurers, American Insurance Association, American Petroleum Institute, Association of American Railroads, California Bankers Association, European-ame (5/6/2002) Briefs   FN1. Pursuant to Rule 37.3 of the Rules of this Court, the parties have consented to the filing of this brief. The parties' letters of consent have been lodged with the Clerk of the Court.... 2002  
  Opening Brief of Plaintiffs-appellants (3/5/2002) Briefs   FN1. A copy of § 354.6 is attached hereto as Exhibit A. FN2. Here, as elsewhere in this Opening Brief, emphasis has been added unless otherwise indicated. FN3. Linda Goetz Holmes, a noted... 2002  
  Opening Brief of Plaintiffs-appellants (3/12/2002) Briefs   On Dec. 26, 2001, this Court consolidated for appeal eight cases brought by U.S. and Allied veterans of World War II seeking damages against Japanese companies (and their successors in... 2002  
  Plaintiffs-appellant's Opeining Brief (3/7/2002) Briefs   FNAttorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants FN[Additional counsel appear on signature page.] Plaintiffs-appellants in these seven cases are Korean and Chinese World War II-era forced-labor... 2002  
  Reply Brief of Burt Neuborne (2/28/2002) Briefs   In his opening brief, appellant, Walter Steven Zeisl, alleges that members of the Austrian bank settlement class in In re Austrian and German Bank Holocaust Litigation. Master File No. 98... 2002  
  Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate, Prohibition, or Other Appropriate Relief (3/18/2002) Briefs   Jeong's constant references to what he calls the trial court's findings betray a misunderstanding of the trial court's opinion and of this Court's role. The trial court did not, and could... 2002  
  Supplemental Reply Brief of Burt Neuborne (3/19/2002) Briefs   Burt Neuborne, as appellant in 01-9229(C), and as appellee in 01-9193 (L), submits this Supplemental Reply Brief in response to assertions made by appellant Walter S. Zeisl for the first... 2002  
  In re Nazi Era Cases Against German Defendants Litigation 213 F.Supp.2d 439, United States District Court, D. New Jersey. (7/23/2002) Cases As of January 6, 2020 case has not been reversed or overruled. LITIGATION - Settlements. Separate action to enforce settlement agreement resolving Nazi era litigation was proper. 2002  
  Lloyd-el v. U.s. Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. (12/19/2002) Cases As of January 6, 2020 case has not been reversed or overruled. Plaintiffs' complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on April 11, 2002, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Ila Jeanne Sensenich for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation,... 2002  
  Obadele v. U.s. 52 Fed.Cl. 432, United States Court of Federal Claims. (4/24/2002) Cases As of January 6, 2020 has some negative history but has not been reversed or overruled. GOVERNMENT - United States. Civil Liberties Act does not violate equal protection or due process. 2002  
  U.s. v. Foster Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. (10/18/2002) Cases As of January 6, 2020 has some negative history but has not been reversed or overruled. This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for summary judgment. The motion was filed by the government on August 30, 2002. The government's complaint and motion for summary judgment seek a permanent injunction against Mr. Foster, preventing him from acting as a tax return preparer and from preparing returns that contain claims for... 2002  
  U.s. v. Mims Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Statesboro Division. (11/14/2002) Cases As of January 6, 2020 case has not been reversed or overruled. This cause comes before the Court on the parties' joint motion for entry of permanent injunction. The Court, having reviewed the motion, finds that the motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: A. Pursuant to IRC § 7407, Defendants and their representatives, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons in active concert or... 2002  
  (Deposition of Joe R. Feagin) (9/10/2002) Expert Materials   Videotaped Deposition of JOE R. FEAGIN, taken in the above-entitled matter before Douglas M. Burke, Notary Public of the State of New York, taken at the offices of Loeb & Loeb, LLP, 345... 2002  
  (Partial Testimony) (9/10/2002) Expert Materials   Videotaped Deposition of JOE R. FEAGIN, taken in the above-entitled matter before Douglas M. Burke, Notary Public of the State of New York, taken at the offices of Loeb & Loeb, LLP, 345... 2002  
  Declaration of Timothy J. Wise (6/10/2002) Expert Materials   Timothy Wise declares as follow: 1 I am currently a full-time lecturer, writer and anti-racism trainer, who contracts independently with institutions throughout the country seeking advice... 2002  
  Deposition of William M. Carter, Jr. (12/30/2002) Expert Materials   Deposition of William M. Carter, Jr., a witness herein, called by the defendants for cross-examination pursuant to the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, taken before Jacqueline L. Reichert,... 2002  
  Deposition of William M. Carter, Jr. (12/30/2002) Expert Materials   Deposition of William M. Carter, Jr., a witness herein, called by the defendants for cross-examination pursuant to the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, taken before Jacqueline L. Reichert,... 2002  
Paul J. Otterstedt A Natural Rights Approach to Regulatory Takings 7 Texas Review of Law and Politics 25 (Fall 2002) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   I. Introduction. 27 II. Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Constitutional Interpretation: A Primer. 29 A. Introduction. 29 B. Lockean Natural Law and Natural Rights. 31 C. Lockean Property Rights. 34 D. Lockean Expression in the Declaration. 35 E. Commentators' Interpretations. 36 F. Classical Liberal Originalism. 41 III. Eminent Domain: Background.... 2002  
Harold Hongju Koh A United States Human Rights Policy for the 21st Century 46 Saint Louis University Law Journal 293 (Spring 2002) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   I. A General Approach to Human Rights Policy. 296 A. Bureaucratic Lessons. 296 B. Human Rights Principles. 301 1. A Page of History. 301 2. Truth, Justice, Engagement, and the Democratic Way. 306 a. Telling the Truth. 306 b. Justice. 311 c. Inside-Outside Engagement, with Governments and the Private Sector. 316 d. Strategies of Prevention: Early... 2002  
Jack Greenberg Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Confronting the Condition and Theory 43 Boston College Law Review 521 (May, 2002) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   Abstract: The author argues that when the Supreme Court next confronts the issue of affirmative action in higher education, it should examine the policy realisticallyin terms of the condition of blacks and the consequences for the countrynot abstractly, and uphold its constitutionality. In reaching this conclusion, the author: discusses the... 2002  
Mark R. Brown Affirmative Inaction: Stories from a Small Southern School 75 Temple Law Review 201 (Summer 2002) Law Review Articles and Other Secondary Sources   Fellow citizens, we cannot escape history. - Abraham Lincoln The Fifth Circuit held in Hopwood v. Texas that an applicant's race or ethnicity cannot be used to support student diversity at a public college or university. Whether designed to enhance diversity or to redress past discrimination, affirmative action is, according to the Fifth Circuit,... 2002  
49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66