AuthorTitleCitationSummaryYearKey Terms
Courtney A. Stouff Native Americans and Homeland Security: Failure of the Homeland Security Act to Recognize Tribal Sovereignty 108 Penn State Law Review 375 (Summer, 2003) The United States of America was forever changed on September 11, 2001 when terrorists from the al Qaeda network hijacked two commercial airliners and flew them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. A third hijacked airliner flew into the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., while a fourth hijacked airliner crashed in a deserted... 2003 Yes
Carlos Scott López Native Title in Mabo's Wake: Aboriginal Sovereignty and Reconciliation in Post-centenary Australia 11 Tulsa Journal of Comparative & International Law 21 (Fall 2003) Few issues have spurred more vigorous debate among Australia's citizenry than Native Title and, more broadly, the roles of Native Australians. Like most former colonial outposts, the settlement of the Australian continent was marked by nothing less than an invasion by a European power (Great Britain), which subsequently imposed its will on the... 2003 Yes
Heather Chamberlain Native Waters: Contemporary Indian Water Settlements and the Second Treaty Era, the University of Arizona Press, Tucson (2002); 237pp; $45.00; Isbn 0-8165-2227-8, Hardcover. 7 University of Denver Water Law Review 129 (Fall 2003) Native Waters evaluates the cultural, economic, and ecological effects of Indian/Anglo water settlements. The second treaty era refers to settlement agreements between tribes and their Anglo neighbors over Indian water rights reserved during the creation of tribal reservations. Typically during settlements, tribes have given away a portion of... 2003 Yes
Jonathan I. Sirois Remote Vendor Cigarette Sales, Tribal Sovereignty, and the Jenkins Act: Can I Get a Remedy? 42 Duquesne Law Review 27 (Fall, 2003) Nearly $900 million in revenue went up in smoke [in 2002] because [New York State] didn't collect taxes on sales made over the Internet [by] Indian[s]. [T]his Court [has] held that Indian retailers on an Indian reservation may be required to collect all state taxes applicable to [cigarette] sales to non-Indians. We determined that requiring the... 2003 Yes
Robert J. Nordhaus , G. Emlen Hall, , Anne Alise Rudio Revisiting Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe: Robert Nordhaus and Sovereign Indian Control over Natural Resources on Reservations 43 Natural Resources Journal 223 (Winter 2003) In 1982, the Supreme Court held in Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe that tribes have the sovereign power to tax non-member oil and gas lessees on reservations. Merrion sanctioned an expansive view of tribal sovereignty at a time when many western tribes were adapting to a new federal policy of self determination by trying to take charge of natural... 2003 Yes
Lauren K. Robel Sovereignty and Democracy: the States' Obligations to Their Citizens under Federal Statutory Law 78 Indiana Law Journal 543 (Winter/Spring, 2003) I. L2-3,T3Strong Sovereignty: The Dignity of the States 546 II. L2-3,T3Sovereign Immunity in the States 547 A. Sovereign Immunity and Democratic Values. 553 B. Sovereign Immunity and the Modern Administrative State. 555 C. Sovereign Immunity and Post-War Theories of Loss-Spreading. 556 D. Sovereign Immunity and Justice: The Political Salience of... 2003 Yes
Douglas Luckerman Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, and Environmental Primacy on Tribal Lands 37 New England Law Review 635 (Spring 2003) Good afternoon everybody. As Professor Dussias just mentioned, I came to Indian law sort of in a different fashion, in that, in 1992, I was just a white guy from Chicago working at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). My experience with Native Americans, at that time, consisted of television and maybe the odd book or two. In 1992, I had the... 2003 Yes
Eric Cheyfitz The Colonial Double Bind: Sovereignty and Civil Rights in Indian Country 5 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 223 (January, 2003) Federal Indian law emerges from the late eighteenth century onward as a corpus that departs distinctively from the central core of U.S. law. While the latter is grounded, in the first instance, in the civil rights of the individual, understood in the Lockean sense as having a fundamental property in him or herself and thus as always an actual or... 2003 Yes
Susan R. Fiorentino Timpanogos Tribe v. Conway: Fishing for an Exception to State Sovereign Immunity in Natural Resource Regulation 14 Villanova Environmental Law Journal 255 (2003) At times, we did not have enough to eat and we were not allowed to hunt. All we wanted was peace and to be let alone. -- Crazy Horse of the Sioux The land and its natural resources have always played an integral role in the lives of Native Americans. Hunting and fishing on tribal reservations provide tribes with more than just food; such... 2003 Yes
L. Scott Gould Tough Love for Tribes: Rethinking Sovereignty after Atkinson and Hicks 37 New England Law Review 669 (Spring 2003) It is an article of faith among American Indian tribes, and most scholars who write about them, that tribes possess the powers of inherent sovereigns. The reasoning, based on an 1832 opinion by Chief Justice Marshall, is that tribes are free to govern their territories as they choose, except as limited by acts of Congress. What many tribes and... 2003 Yes
Daan Braveman Tribal Sovereignty: Them and Us 82 Oregon Law Review 75 (Spring 2003) A central theme in federal Indian law focuses on the inherent sovereign power of tribes to regulate the activities of non-tribal members who enter Indian country. Chief Justice Marshall addressed this issue 170 years ago in Worcester v. Georgia, one of the foundational cases in federal Indian law. Worcester did not end the matter, and tribal... 2003 Yes
Gregory C. Sisk Yesterday and Today: of Indians, Breach of Trust, Money, and Sovereign Immunity 39 Tulsa Law Review 313 (Winter 2003) Twice in the past quarter century, the Supreme Court has composed a duet of Indian breach of trust decisions that, through dynamic counterpoint, complement each other to produce a reasonably harmonious arrangement. Each of these two judicial movements sets one decision that finds an actionable fiduciary relationship against another decision that... 2003 Yes
Carole Goldberg American Indians and "Preferential" Treatment 49 UCLA Law Review 943 (April, 2002) Preferences and benefits for American Indians predate the American policy of affirmative action and flow from different rationales. Nonetheless, Indian preferences are the latest targets in the battle against affirmative action. Opponents of Indian preferences and benefits have long deployed the rhetoric of equal rights to attack treaty rights and... 2002 Yes
Nancy Carol Carter American Indians and Law Libraries: Acknowledging the Third Sovereign 94 Law Library Journal J. 7 (Winter, 2002) American Indian tribal governments constitute a third sovereign within the United States federal system. A higher legal profile among these self-governing entities multiplies legal issues and challenges law libraries. Law librarians are urged to deepen their understanding of American Indian law and tribal law and reconsider their handling within... 2002 Yes
Anthony G. Gulig , Sidney L. Harring An Indian Cannot Get a Morsel of Pork . . . . a Retrospective on Crow Dog, Lone Wolf, Blackbird, Tribal Sovereignty, Indian Land, and Writing Indian Legal History 38 Tulsa Law Review 87 (Fall 2002) Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, one of the many landmark Indian law cases wrongfully decided in the United States, can be discussed on a number of levels. One place to start is with the role that the case played in depriving many Indian tribes of their lands. Lone Wolf's infamous holding that Congress has plenary power over Indians and can dispose of... 2002 Yes
Leonika Charging Atkinson Trading Company v. Shirley: a Taxing Decision on Tribal Sovereign Power 47 South Dakota Law Review 134 (2002) In Atkinson Trading Company v. Shirley, the United States Supreme Court held that the Navajo Nation did not possess the authority to impose a hotel occupancy tax on non-members located on fee land within the reservation. In so deciding, the Court failed to properly consider the consensual relationship established between the tribe and non-member... 2002 Yes
Sam Deloria Commentary on Nation-building: the Future of Indian Nations 34 Arizona State Law Journal 55 (Spring, 2002) One time I was about to testify to the Senate Committee, one of the rare occasions when I wrangled an invitation. Mr. Gover came up and said, Now don't go rolling a hand grenade down the aisle there. So I guess the few people that know me consider me something of a loose hand grenade launcher-which is alright. I've listened with great interest to... 2002 Yes
Melissa L. Meyer, University of California, Los Angeles David E. Wilkins, American Indian Sovereignty and the U.s. Supreme Court: the Masking of Justice, Austin, University of Texas Press, 1997. Pp. Vii + 403. $40.00 (0-292-79108-9). 20 Law and History Review 200 (Spring, 2002) In American Indian Sovereignty and the U. S. Supreme Court: The Masking of Justice, David E. Wilkins painstakingly analyzes fifteen Supreme Court decisions that repeatedly eroded American Indian tribal sovereignty step by step. By systematically rendering the situations that gave rise to the cases and the precedents for ruling otherwise, Wilkins... 2002 Yes
Todd Miller Easements on Tribal Sovereignty 26 American Indian Law Review 105 (2001-2002) There are more than fifty million acres of Indian trust lands in the United States, with the bulk of them located in the western half of the country. Thousands of miles of easements cross over Indian lands for one purpose or another. These easements include rights-of-way for highways, railroads, electric transmission lines, oil and gas pipelines,... 2002 Yes
Kaighn Smith Jr. Fighting for a Federal Forum in Indian Sovereignty Cases: a Primer 49-APR Federal Lawyer 37 (March/April, 2002) Every Indian lawyer knows that principles of tribal sovereignty should be fought out in federal court not in state court. Although Indian affairs are uniquely federal concerns, a host of obstacles stands in the way of assuring the adjudication of tribal rights in a federal forum. The Supreme Court's penchant for states' rights does not help. The... 2002 Yes
William Trapani Native American Sovereignty in an Age of Manifest Manners 3 Journal of Law in Society Society 1 (Winter, 2002) According to a circular law with which philosophy is familiar, we will affirm that the one who is the most, most purely, or most rigorously, most essentially, Franco-Maghrebian would allow us to decipher what it is to be Franco-Maghrebian in general. We will decipher the essence of the Franco-Maghrebian from the paradigmatic example of the most... 2002 Yes
Emily J. Huitsing Native American Tribes to Waive Their Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Clear and Unequivocal Contracts to Arbitrate 2002 Journal of Dispute Resolution 213 (2002) Native American tribes enjoy immunity from suits on contracts made on or off a reservation. A tribe is subject to suit only if it has clearly waived its immunity or Congress has expressly authorized the suit. Tribal immunity was given to the tribes on the principle that tribes are sovereigns or quasi sovereigns enjoying immunity from judicial... 2002 Yes
R. H K Lei Lindsey Native Hawaiians, Legal Realities, and Politics as Usual 24 University of Hawaii Law Review 693 (Summer, 2002) This land is ours, our Hawai'i. Shall we be deprived of our nationality? More than 104 years have passed since Native Hawaiians united in protest to support their nation-the Hawaiian Kingdom-and to oppose annexation to the United States. The century since has witnessed significant changes that have had a detrimental impact on the Native Hawaiian... 2002 Yes
Amy Crafts Nevada v. Hicks and its Implication on American Indian Sovereignty 34 Connecticut Law Review 1249 (Summer, 2002) In Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, we held that tribes have no inherent criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians in tribal court. In light of the nearly universal understanding dating from the origins of this country's dealings with the tribes that they do not possess criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians except as permitted by treaty, and in... 2002 Yes
Sarah H. Cleveland Powers Inherent in Sovereignty: Indians, Aliens, Territories, and the Nineteenth Century Origins of Plenary Power over Foreign Affairs 81 Texas Law Review Rev. 1 (November, 2002) I. Introduction. 3 II. Sovereignty and the Constitution. 15 A. Sovereignty. 15 B. The Constitution's Scope. 17 1. Enumerated Powers-Limited Government. 19 2. Social Contract-Membership. 20 3. Territoriality. 22 III. Inherent Power Over Indian Tribes. 25 A. Indians and Sovereignty under International Law. 28 B. The Doctrine of Discovery and The... 2002 Yes
Robert Erickson Protecting Tribal Waters: the Clean Water Act Takes over Where Tribal Sovereignty Leaves off 15 Tulane Environmental Law Journal 425 (Summer 2002) I. Introduction. 425 II. Tribal Sovereignty and Early Reservation Water Rights. 426 III. The Clean Water Act. 429 IV. Treating Tribes as States. 432 V. Improving and Preserving Reservation Water Quality. 437 VI. Conclusion. 442 2002 Yes
Gavin Clarkson Reclaiming Jurisprudential Sovereignty: a Tribal Judiciary Analysis 50 University of Kansas Law Review 473 (April, 2002) For both political and economic reasons, American Indian tribes should reclaim jurisprudential sovereignty by establishing or reestablishing vibrant judiciaries, and those tribes can look to other tribal court systems as potential structural models of jurisprudence. Such reclamation is politically important since tribal courts are the primary... 2002 Yes
Francine R. Skenandore Revisiting Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez: Feminist Perspectives on Tribal Sovereignty 17 Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 347 (Fall 2002) Much has been written about tribal sovereignty. If those words have any meaning at all, they must mean that a tribe can make and enforce its decisions without regard to whether an external authority considers those decisions wise. To abrogate tribal decisions, particularly in the delicate area of membership, for whatever good reasons, is to... 2002 Yes
Jeanette Wolfley Rice v. Cayetano: the Supreme Court Declines to Extend Federal Indian Law Native Hawaiians Sovereign Rights 3 Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal J. 6 (July, 2002) Good Evening. I am honored to be here with you and to participate on this panel to discuss the decision in Rice v. Cayetano. I feel privileged to share some thoughts with you about the decision as it relates to Indian Country, and its impact on Indian tribes and individual Indians. The grand scholar of federal Indian law, Felix S. Cohen, wrote in... 2002 Yes
Thomas E. Luebben , Cathy Nelson The Indian Wars: Efforts to Resolve Western Shoshone Land and Treaty Issues and to DisTribute the Indian Claims Commission Judgment Fund 42 Natural Resources Journal 801 (Fall, 2002) International human rights agencies have found the United States in violation of international treaties and human rights standards by denying the Western Shoshone Nation the use of their ancestral lands. The 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley did not cede any Western Shoshone land to the United States, nor did it purport to take or extinguish Western... 2002 Yes
Andrea M. Seielstad The Recognition and Evolution of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Federal Law: Legal, Historical, and Normative Reflections on a Fundamental Aspect of American Indian Sovereignty 37 Tulsa Law Review 661 (Spring 2002) It is inherent in the nature of sovereignty, not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent. This is the general sense and the general practice of mankind; and the exemption, as one of the attributes of sovereignty, is now enjoyed by the government of every state in the union. [Indian tribes are] distinct, independent... 2002 Yes
Andrea M. Seielstad The Recognition and Evolution of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Federal Law: Legal, Historical, and Normative Reflections on a Fundamental Aspect of American Indian Sovereignty 37 Tulsa Law Review 661 (Spring 2002) It is inherent in the nature of sovereignty, not to be amenable to the suit of an individual without its consent. This is the general sense and the general practice of mankind; and the exemption, as one of the attributes of sovereignty, is now enjoyed by the government of every state in the union. [Indian tribes are] distinct, independent... 2002 Yes
Claudeen Bates Arthur The Role of the Tribal Attorney 34 Arizona State Law Journal 21 (Spring, 2002) My name is Claudeen Bates Arthur. That is what they call me, but who I really am is a Tsenjikini woman. My fathers are Naaneesht'ezhi Tachiinii and my grandparents on my father's side are Kinyaa'aanii and on my mother's side are Naakai. That is who I really am. I also am the grandmother of eight grandsons and only one granddaughter. I tell you this... 2002 Yes
Kirsten Matoy Carlson Towards Tribal Sovereignty and Judicial Efficiency: Ordering the Defenses of Tribal Sovereign Immunity and Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies 101 Michigan Law Review 569 (November, 2002) Introduction. 569 I. Courts Should Hear Tribal Sovereign Immunity First Because Sovereign Immunity Is Jurisdictional. 580 A. Courts Treat Defenses of Sovereign Immunity Like Jurisdiction. 581 B. Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies Is Not Jurisdictional. 584 II. A Model for Hearing Tribal Defenses in Federal Courts. 587 A. Nonwaiver Cases. 588 B. Waiver... 2002 Yes
Kirsten Matoy Carlson Towards Tribal Sovereignty and Judicial Efficiency: Ordering the Defenses of Tribal Sovereign Immunity and Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies 101 Michigan Law Review 569 (November, 2002) Introduction. 569 I. Courts Should Hear Tribal Sovereign Immunity First Because Sovereign Immunity Is Jurisdictional. 580 A. Courts Treat Defenses of Sovereign Immunity Like Jurisdiction. 581 B. Exhaustion of Tribal Remedies Is Not Jurisdictional. 584 II. A Model for Hearing Tribal Defenses in Federal Courts. 587 A. Nonwaiver Cases. 588 B. Waiver... 2002 Yes
David Matheson Tribal Sovereignty: Preserving Our Way of Life 34 Arizona State Law Journal 15 (Spring, 2002) Thank you everybody. It's good to be here. When I was looking at the speakers' panel that I was going to be on, I couldn't help but notice that it was all attorneys. I started trying to think of what I was going to talk about, trying to predict what the others were going to talk about, and that's why I thought I'd talk more on the cultural side.... 2002 Yes
Robert B. Porter - Odawi Two Kinds of Indians, Two Kinds of Indian Nation Sovereignty: a Surreply to Professor Lavelle 11 Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 629 (Spring, 2002) If you can free your mind, the body will follow. - Morpheus I. INTRODUCTION John LaVelle, my colleague at the University of South Dakota, graciously took up the task of commenting on my article arguing against the increasing practice of American Indians to self-identify as, and to exercise the political rights of, American citizens. Professor... 2002 Yes
Joan Meyler A Matter of Misinterpretation, State Sovereign Immunity, and Eleventh Amendment Jurisprudence: the Supreme Court's Reformation of the Constitution Inseminole Tribe and its Progeny 45 Howard Law Journal 77 (Fall 2001) Justice Kennedy, in Alden v. Maine, states the underpinnings of the United States Supreme Court's recent decisions holding that Congress cannot subject states to suit by individuals under its Article I powers: This Court has been consistent in interpreting the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment as conclusive evidence that the decision in Chisholm... 2001 Yes
John Rockwell Snowden , Wayne Tyndall , David Smith American Indian Sovereignty and Naturalization: It's a Race Thing 80 Nebraska Law Review 171 (2001) I. A Sketch of Naturalization in the United States. 176 A. The Historical Background of Naturalization in the United States. 176 1. English Roots: The Theory of Natural Allegiance. 176 2. The Colonial Experience: The Theory of Volitional Allegiance Emerges. 179 3. Defining the Qualifications for Naturalization After Independence. 181 B. Current... 2001 Yes
Elizabeth Roat Analyzing Conflicts Between Indian Treaty Rights and Federal Conservation Regulations: Are State Regulation Standards Appropriate? 84 Marquette Law Review 701 (Spring 2001) In July 1998, officials of the United States Department of Agriculture's Forest Service cited David J. Gotchnik for using a motorized vehicle in a no motor area of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) in the Superior National Forest in Minnesota. Gotchnik was traveling across Basswood Lake in northern Minnesota in a canoe powered by... 2001 Yes
  California Indian Tribe Treated as a Corporation for Tax Purposes 11-OCT Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives 43 (October, 2001) In a novel administrative case, Appeal of Flores, 2001 WL 809299 (Cal. SBE No. 98R-0910, Case No. 89002462360, 6/21/01), the California State Board of Equalization (SBE) concluded that, for tax purposes, an Indian tribe more closely resembled a corporation than a partnership. This determination, which reversed the findings of the California... 2001 Yes
Trishanda L. Hinton Child Custody Proceedings: Replace the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act; Establish Updated, Uniform Procedures for Child Custody Proceedings; Provide How Courts of this State Shall Treat Indian Tribes and Foreign Countries in Child Custo 18 Georgia State University Law Review 58 (Fall, 2001) Code Sections: O.C.G.A. §§ 19-9-40 to -51, -61 to -70, -81 to -97, -101 to -104 (amended) Bill Number: SB 118 Act Number: 28 Georgia Laws: 2001 Ga. Laws 129 Summary: This Act updates the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act to include the requirements of the Hague Convention and two federal statutes enacted since the passage of the original law.... 2001 Yes
Kristina Marie Reader Empowering Tribes--the District of Columbia Circuit Upholds Tribal Authority to Regulate Air Quality Throughout Reservation Lands in Arizona Public Service Company v. Environmental Protection Agency 12 Villanova Environmental Law Journal 295 (2001) Congress adopted the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1963 to combat the serious decline of the nation's ambient air quality. The stated goal of CAA was to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation's air resources. In 1990, Congress amended the statute to ensure that Native American nations (Tribes) could participate more fully in CAA programs. As a... 2001 Yes
Rose Weston Facing the Past, Facing the Future: Applying the Truth Commission Model to the Historic Native Americans in the United States 18 Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 1017 (2001) We have to face the unpleasant as well as the affirmative side of the human story, including our own story as a nation, our own stories of our peoples. We have got to have the ugly facts in order to protect us from the official view of reality. Bill Moyers, Journalist The history of the United States is rife with allegations of the most serious... 2001 Yes
Alex Tallchief Skibine High Level Nuclear Waste on Indian Reservations: Pushing the Tribal Sovereignty Envelope to the Edge? 21 Journal of Land, Resources,and Environmental Law 287 (2001) Private Fuel Storage (PFS), a private consortium of utilities has petitioned the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a license to temporarily store up to 4,000 casks containing about 40,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) at a site located on the Goshute Skull Valley Indian Reservation. Under the proposal, the tribe would lease its land... 2001 Yes
Larry EchoHawk , Tessa Meyer Santiago Idaho Indian Treaty Rights: Historical Roots and Modern Applications 44-OCT Advocate 15 (October, 2001) Five tribes currently live within the borders of Idaho. Most of these tribes, at some point in their history, participated in a treaty-making process with the United States government. During this process, the United States exchanged the promise of future support for the millions of acres of land occupied by the tribes under aboriginal title. Many... 2001 Yes
Dan T. Coenen Institutional Arrangements and Individual Rights: a Comment on Professor Tribe's Critique of the Modern Court's Treatment of Constitutional Liberty 2001 University of Illinois Law Review 1159 (2001) Professor Coenen analyzes Professor Tribe's contention that the present day Supreme Court's constitutional work is marked by an unjustified two-track approach. Professor Tribe has built this claim on an elaborate assessment of Saenz v. Roe, in which the Court--to the surprise of many prognosticators-- invalidated a state statute that imposed... 2001 Yes
Audrey I. Benison International Criminal Tribunals: Is There a Substantive Limitation on the Treaty Power? 37 Stanford Journal of International Law 75 (Winter 2001) I have been accused by advocates of this court of engaging in 18th century thinking . . . . Well, I find this to be a compliment. It was 18th century thinking that gave us our Constitution. It was 18th century thinking that gave us the fundamental protections of our Bill of Rights . . . . If Madison and the other Founding Fathers were here today, I... 2001 Yes
Frank Shockey Invidious American Indian Tribal Sovereignty: Morton v. Mancari Contra Adarand Constructors, Inc., v. Pena, Rice v. Cayetano, and Other Recent Cases 25 American Indian Law Review 275 (2000-2001) To import generic equal protection theories . . . into federal Indian law constitutes an error of significant magnitude, for it confuses a puzzling, conceptually intractable, and little-understood corner of public law with its mainstream. Professor Philip Frickey, among other commentators, has expressed concern about the continuing viability of... 2001 Yes
Jeremy Clinefelter Just Say the "Magic Words": Advocating an Arbitration Clause Should Be Held to an Express Waiver Standard for the Doctrine of Indian Sovereign Immunity - C&l Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe 25 American Indian Law Review 315 (2000-2001) Under normal circumstances, when two parties agree to an arbitration clause in a construction contract, executed on privately owned land, both parties may reasonably be assured of a speedy resolution to any dispute arising thereon. Circumstances change, however, if one of the parties is a federally recognized Indian tribe. Indian tribes, like... 2001 Yes
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22